medieval-religion: Scholarly discussions of medieval religion and culture
Dear Erik,
Yes, it's a mildly amusing coincidence. More amusing would be an actual Sol(l)em(p)nitas for Sol(l)em(p)nis. But I think that's at least as hopeless as having another Roman pontiff who chooses to be called Sixtus (since we've had five of those already, the next would be Sixtus VI).
Linguistically, a _solemnitas_ for Solemnis is no odder than a _festum_ for Festus.
For 'Solemnis' in the Gallo-Roman onomastic repertory, cf. the Solemnis son of Satigenus who left at Alesia, today's Alise-Ste-Reine (Côte d'Or), the small votive inscription to Epona reproduced about halfway down this page:
http://www.epona.net/inscriptions.html
or the earlier third-century aristocrat T. Sennius Solemnis, a native of today's Vieux (Calvados), whose career is summarized here:
http://tinyurl.com/ydoqtfk
Best,
John Dillon
On Friday, September 25, 2009, on 8:21 pm, Erik Drigsdahl wrote:
> John, has it not crossed your mind how strange it is for a bishop to
> carry a name that was a liturgical feast degree in his time?
> In multiple liturgical calendars is his name spelled "Sollempni epi."
> - with other days classified as "Solempnus" (Solemn feasts, like the
> Assumption of the Virgin (15 Aug.) in every town with a Nôtre-Dame
> church in France).
>
> Since there not is any other saint in France by that name has it
> always puzzled me.
> And it still does.
> Best wishes
> Erik Drigsdahl
>
>
> At 10:42 -0500 25/09/09, John Dillon wrote:
> >For 'Solemnius' (a more recent form surviving in potted saint's
> lives) read either 'Sollemnis' (Gregory's name form for S., also that
> of S.'s early Chartrian Vita) or 'Solemnis' (the spelliog used by the
> RM in its revision of 2001).
> >
> >There is a point of view, espoused by Duchesne and followed by
> others, that regards the S. of Chartres as originally distinct from
> Gregory's S. That's quite possible, though there's not enough
> evidence about early constructions of a saint of this name to exclude
> an original identity. But from the time of the Translation account
> (BHL 7820; dated by Levison to the mid-ninth century) onward the two
> figures have been conjoined.
>
> >On Friday, September 25, 2009, at 1:40 am, I wrote:
> >
> >> 3) Solemnius (d. late 5th or very early 6th cent.). We first hear
> of
> >> S. (also Sollemnis, Solennis, etc.; in French, Solenne, Solein, etc.)
> >> from St. Gregory of Tours, who narrates (_In gloria confessorum_, 21)
> >> his inventio at a monastery at today's Luynes (Indre-et-Loire)
> >> followed by healing miracles at his tomb.
> >
> >
>
> --
> _________________________________________________________
> Erik Drigsdahl CHD Center for Haandskriftstudier
> Kapelvej 25B 3.tv. E-mail: <[log in to unmask]>
> DK-2200 Copenhagen N http://www.chd.dk
> Phone: +45 + 3537 2047
**********************************************************************
To join the list, send the message: join medieval-religion YOUR NAME
to: [log in to unmask]
To send a message to the list, address it to:
[log in to unmask]
To leave the list, send the message: leave medieval-religion
to: [log in to unmask]
In order to report problems or to contact the list's owners, write to:
[log in to unmask]
For further information, visit our web site:
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/medieval-religion.html
|