Hi Stephen,
The VOVIEWS are not per VO but per queue_GROUP_ENABLE variable, right? So it would be a FQANVOVIEWS=yes/no per variable in queue_GROUP_ENABLE, right? I think that would be possible to implement.
Cheers,
Maria
-----Original Message-----
From: LHC Computer Grid - Rollout [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Burke, Stephen (STFC,RAL,PPD)
Sent: 03 September 2009 12:09
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [LCG-ROLLOUT] VOVIEWS job info
LHC Computer Grid - Rollout [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On
Behalf Of Arnau Bria said:
> As Maarten pointed yesterday, I've solved my VOVIEW problem, but not
lhcb's one.
> So, I'm on the second part of our problem, what to do if two VOs
request diff publication.
I wonder if this should go to the GDB for discussion ... there's a long
history behind this, the job priorities working group started in about
2006!
(http://egee-intranet.web.cern.ch/egee-intranet/NA1/TCG/wgs/priority.htm
- if Jeff Templon is around he may well comment.) Looking at the list of
people it seems that lhcb weren't involved so they may have some reason
not to want this configured, and in any case DENY rules are a temporary
hack to solve a specific problem with the WMS matching. The MWSG was
supposed to be working on a "real" solution, and there was a report on
that more than a year ago: https://edms.cern.ch/document/887174/1 but
I'm not sure if there has been any progress on implementation.
Presumably it would be possible to allow this to be configured for each
VO separately, but I don't know how difficult that would be, maybe Maria
can comment.
Stephen
--
Scanned by iCritical.
|