Thomas Baker wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 04, 2009 at 02:41:46PM +0200, Julian Reschke wrote:
>>> OK, so is anybody in *favor* of republishing through the IETF?
>>> Otherwise I'll continue to work on the draft I proposed.
>> OK, I haven't heard anything new since early July.
>> Does anybody have a problem with me submitting the draft for publication
>> as RFC?
>
> Julian,
>
> DCMI agrees with your initiative to submit the obsoleting RFC.
>
> It is my understanding that you have submitted a first Internet
> Draft [1] for a proposed RFC in order to mark RFC 2731 [2] as
> "historic" (obsolete) and point readers to more current
> specifications on the DCMI Web site, and that the text of RFC
> 2731 will remain accessible.
>
> The option of revising the RFC by republishing the text of the
> current DC-HTML recommendation through IETF would entail a
> longer-term maintenance burden.
>
> We would appreciate if you could occasionally report as the
> draft progresses through IETF process.
>
> Tom
> ...
Hi,
progress report: Alexey Melnikov, IETF Apps Area Director, is going to
start the IETF Last Call for
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-reschke-rfc2731bis-02.html>
soon; it will be announced on the ietf-announce mailing list (see
<http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/ietf-announce/current/maillist.html>).
Tracking information will be available from
<https://datatracker.ietf.org/idtracker/draft-reschke-rfc2731bis/>.
Best regards, Julian
|