Subject: | | Re: Rfactor got stuck with a data having alternate strong and weak reflections. |
From: | | Eleanor Dodson <[log in to unmask]> |
Reply-To: | | [log in to unmask][log in to unmask], 8 Sep 2009 21:14:38 +0530573_ISO-8859-1 Hi all,
Thanks for the reply. I have ultimately used 15% glycerol as cryo. It worked well. I referred to this paper McFerrin and Snell, Cryoprotectant quantification J. Appl. Cryst. (2002). 35, 538±545. Now setting up grid with different concentrations of jeffamine.
Arpita
Below is a summary of messages I received;
Hi..
Sorry for the non-ccp4 query.I have a protein crystal growing at 0.1 M HEPES-Na (pH7.5), 20% Jeffamine M-600 (sitting drop). Can anyone please suggest for the cryprotectant to be used? [...]40_8Sep200921:14:[log in to unmask] |
Date: | | Wed, 2 Sep 2009 10:29:41 +0100 |
Content-Type: | | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
|
|
You must have a pseudo translation vector of ~ 0.02 0.5 0.0
That relates solution 1 and 2, and 3 and 4.
That makes it hard to determine space group - there will be absences
along 0k0 because of the translation so the space group could be P 2i 2
2i or P2i 21 2i
But which ever SG it is thedata with k odd will be weak, and that means
you will have a higher R factor.
Eleanor
Jerry McCully wrote:
> Dear all:
>
> I am currently refining a structure solved by MAD and somehow the R factor got stuck around 30% with 2.2 resolution.
>
> There are four molecules in one ASU. Two had very good density map and the other two were not equally good.
>
> I tried using NCS during refinement but it did not help much.
>
> Then I checked my data. Actually I found that there are alternate layers of strong and weak reflections.
> THe crystal is in a thin-plate shape with orthorombic space group.
>
> Then I looked at my molecular replacement solution from Phaser using my native data.
>
> Actually phaser gave two sets of solutions, which showed slightly different positions.
>
> You can also see that there is a translation inside the same set of solution.
>
>
> SOLU SET RFZ=12.8 TFZ=21.4 PAK=0 LLG=452 RFZ=10.7 TFZ=47.9 PAK=0 LLG=1693 RFZ=13.0 TFZ=47.6 PAK=0 LLG=2791 RFZ=10.7 TFZ=46.1 PAK=0 LLG=4045
> SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER 184.052 0.185 175.770 FRAC -0.49889 -0.00218 -0.00000
> SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER 225.116 0.167 134.696 FRAC -0.47056 0.49706 0.00051
> SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER 359.333 31.677 180.633 FRAC 0.75769 -0.71475 -0.14004
> SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER 359.373 31.969 180.711 FRAC 0.73074 -0.21423 -0.14108
> SOLU SET RFZ=12.8 TFZ=21.4 PAK=0 LLG=452 RFZ=10.7 TFZ=47.9 PAK=0 LLG=1693 RFZ=13.0 TFZ=47.6 PAK=0 LLG=2791 RFZ=10.7 TFZ=47.3 PAK=0 LLG=4042
> SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER 213.115 0.173 146.741 FRAC -0.49931 -0.00269 0.00045
> SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER 248.173 0.254 111.665 FRAC -0.47091 0.49661 0.00101
> SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER 359.399 31.602 180.578 FRAC 0.75808 -0.71455 -0.13980
> SOLU 6DIM ENSE ensemble1 EULER 359.378 31.255 180.361 FRAC 0.78370 -0.21555 -0.13830
>
>
> I remember there is a discussion in CCP4bb about the same topic with the focus of pseudo-symmetry or translational pseudo-symmetry.
>
>
> Can anybody give some troubleshooting about my issue?
>
> Thanks a lot and have a nice weekend,
>
> Jerry McCully
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Windows Live: Keep your friends up to date with what you do online.
> http://windowslive.com/Campaign/SocialNetworking?ocid=PID23285::T:WLMTAGL:ON:WL:en-US:SI_SB_online:082009
>
|
|
|
|