On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 11:04, Douglas McNab<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> 2009/8/20 Burke, Stephen (STFC,RAL,PPD) <[log in to unmask]>
>>
>> Testbed Support for GridPP member institutes
>> > [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Gordon, John
>> > (STFC,RAL,ESC) said:
>> > a) the ICE component in WMS to allow submission via WMS works
>> > reliably.
>> > b) CREAM is demonstrated to be at least as good (performant, reliable,
>> > ??) as LCG-CE.
>>
>> and c) condor-g can submit to it (atlas requirement).
>
> Graeme mentioned to me that there was a condor-g patch available.
> Not sure how production ready it is though...
There is, but it's very much pre-production and I didn't get the
chance to test it before I went on holiday.
From the ATLAS side there's nothing very special used on the CE,
mainly it's just pushing a pilot onto the batch system, so once the
cream/condor-g double act is stable we should be able to drop any
formal lcg-CE requirements. However, I suppose larger sites will
probably want to keep an lcg-CE going for a while until we have some
production experience.
Graeme
>
>>
>>
>> > If CREAM was complete rubbish then there would be pressure to
>> > port the lcg-CE to SL5 and I don't see that.
>>
>> Isn't that what we said for sl4 re the glite CE?!
>>
>> Stephen
>>
>> --
>> Scanned by iCritical.
>
>
>
> --
> ScotGrid, Room 481, Kelvin Building, University of Glasgow
> tel: +44(0)141 330 6439
>
--
Dr Graeme Stewart http://www.physics.gla.ac.uk/~graeme/
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Glasgow, Scotland
DEATH TO MEETINGS!
|