Hi Winnie
I am replying on TB-SUPPORT not the GridPP-USERS list as I think this is
a question more relevant to other sysadmins than UK users.
The CREAM CE has still not met the criteria put in place to indicate
when it is accepted
(https://twiki.cern.ch/twiki/bin/view/LCG/LCGCEtoCREAMCETransition ) to
replace the LCG CE. Therefore it is not recommended.
A couple UK sites have played with the basic CREAM CE - perhaps those
involved could respond to the list with their observations?
Thanks,
Jeremy
-----Original Message-----
From: Discussion list for GridPP Users
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Winnie Lacesso
Sent: 13 August 2009 09:26
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: WLCG migration of WNs to SL5
Dear Doctor,
Bristol's got some new SL5 WN not yet in production - got to build a
new CE to drive them, question is should it be CREAM-CE or lcg-CE?
A while back the concensus seemed to be CREAM-CE was problematic or
just didn't work. Has it improved?
Any UK sites had experience with or using CREAM-CE?
Is it stable/fine or still not yet ready for prime time?
ldapsearch AFAICS shows only 2 sites using it:
GlueForeignKey: GlueClusterUniqueID=cream-ce01.marie.hellasgrid.gr
GlueForeignKey: GlueClusterUniqueID=cream-ce.pdc.kth.se
wl / got -5 min to waste time if CREAM-CE is borken
--
Scanned by iCritical.
|