JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Monospaced Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  August 2009

PHD-DESIGN August 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Structure for practice based PhD

From:

Lubomir Savov Popov <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Lubomir Savov Popov <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 6 Aug 2009 22:28:56 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (33 lines)

Dear Colleagues,

The discussion started with a very practical question about the structure of a dissertation with practice-based research. However, there are very powerful linguistic factors (like this strange Ph.D.) that shifted the talk from the structure of practice-based dissertations to the linguistic and conceptual disturbance in our scholarly world.

The whole confusion stems from an Anglophone practice to use the term Ph.D. (Philosophy Doctor) for everything. It is an anachronism. It has made sense when it has been used initially. After that, it has been used in so many areas, that in some areas it sounds strange and in others it is a misnomer. Another issue is that the Anglophone economies and educations systems are so strong that they practically wiped out any other competitors, different conceptualizations, and practices. In such moments, I realize that a little bit of diversity might be of great help to Anglophone culture, to realize where it is, where it is going, and why it is going there. All that said, I want to express my admiration for the achievements of that culture. It is so powerful that even I oscillate terminologically between several conceptual systems, as you will notice in this post.

In a number of European countries the standards, criteria, and requirements for doctoral work and degree are defined differently in each discipline/profession. The requirements and practices for doctoral work in Physics and Sociology are very different from the requirements for doctoral work in Architecture or Mechanical Engineering.

There is a long tradition to use professional endeavors for dissertation purposes without diluting and contaminating the concept of research and without inventing strange animals like practice-based research or practice as research (if practice is research, then why should we nurture two concepts?) or ....

In engineering it's a tradition to make an invention and then to format it as a dissertation. (I narrow down the options for simplicity.) Actually, in some countries in order to get a doctoral degree in engineering, dissertators need to have at least three patents regarding the artifact they design/invent. The difference between a mere invention and a dissertation based on this invention is in the analytical and retrospective component. The dissertator has to follow particular standards for explicating the process of invention and knowledge production associated with the invention. There are chapters on the literature about this artifact and the methods to design and reinvent it; there are chapters on the theoretical approach to the specific invention situation and the process of invention; chapters on describing the artifact/mechanism; chapters with reflections on the method and process, assessments, conclusions, and recommendations for future work on that subject.

This is a pretty schematic and one-sided description, but in illustrates the specifics of doctoral/dissertation work in particular areas. No one expects pure philosophy, no one expects only data collection, and no one actually will award a doctorate for these activities if they are done for themselves. (With the exception of dissertations with non-design, basic science character. Again, I simplify.)

In the field of architecture, this dissertation type is most often referred to as "building type study/research." Nobody can imagine that these architects are doing philosophical work. The typical product is a building type study or a design guide.

In the arts, when an artist reflects on his/her oeuvre and formats this intellectual work in a particular framework, we get a dissertation. The major contribution of the dissertation is the production of new knowledge through analysis of the state of the art, the process of making, and the oeuvre itself.

Of course, both in engineering and in architecture there is place and actually there are a lot of "pure" Ph.D. dissertation situations. For example, when studying basic science problems, theoretical problems, social factors problems, and so forth. The professions have so many aspects and levels that even in a single profession we can see a multitude of dissertation types of different nature and tradition.

Another problem is the insistence of some faculty to accept an artifact as a research product. The artifact or oeuvre by itself is not research. It is not even practice-based research. And the artifact by itself doesn't produce new knowledge. That is one of the logical fallacies that many people follow. Or, maybe it is not a fallacy, but a deliberate promotion of personal interests. The scholarly act is the act of knowledge production. In order to have a scholarly act, we need to analyze, explicate, and present the artifact and the process of making in accordance to particular methodological standards and criteria that are developed in the discipline/profession.

Unfortunately, because of time constraints I cannot go further in a more detailed description of practice-based dissertations. I wish I have more time and can do all the things in the world that fascinate me. C'est la vie.

Best wishes,

Lubomir

Lubomir Popov, Ph.D.
Interior Design Program
American Culture Studies affiliated faculty
Bowling Green State University

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager