thanks for the prompt reply. But these ACC and occipital clusters are
located quite far from each other (image attached).. I looked through
the image, and couldn't find any voxel connecting those two regions. Any
Mark Jenkinson wrote:
> Are you sure it is not connected?
> It only takes one voxel to connect what otherwise
> look like separate clusters. Your table shows that
> cluster number 3 spans a large range of coordinates,
> so I think that what you consider a separate ACC
> cluster is really connected as part of this larger cluster.
> If you are really sure that this is not the case then email
> us and we will investigate further.
> All the best,
> On 19 Aug 2009, at 16:34, SUBSCRIBE FSL Yoona Kang wrote:
>> in my fsl report page, I noticed that ACC cluster was not listed,
>> it seemed to have substantially strong activation in the images. Then I
>> found that ACC was listed in the local maxima list under occipital pole
>> cluster (image attached). I cannot really understand why this happened..
>> they are not close to each other nor they are connected. The ACC
>> cluster is
>> quite big, too. Can you tell me what is going on?
>> Thank you very much!!
>> <Picture 7.jpg>