Forwarding this across from the Linking Open Data list.
Question: what is the most modern, recommended way to express these
string valued properties?
<meta property="dc:creator" content="Office of Management and Budget"/>
<meta property="dc:publisher" content="General Services Administration"/>
I've heard Tom mention the 1.1 ns as deprecated, and that the terms ns
is the thing to use. If that's the case, what's the preferred idiom for
string-valued properties? Do we use an intermediate node? How does that
look in RDFa?
Dan
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: Re: data.gov now live with RDFa
Resent-Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 11:40:26 +0000
Resent-From: [log in to unmask]
Date: Wed, 19 Aug 2009 12:39:37 +0100
From: Toby Inkster <[log in to unmask]>
To: rick <[log in to unmask]>
CC: [log in to unmask]
On Wed, 2009-08-19 at 06:50 -0400, rick wrote:
> http://www.data.gov/
> The page has two triples.
Ten by my count.
The namespace for Dublin Core is wrong though. It's currently pointed at
<http://dublincore.org/documents/2008/01/14/dcmi-terms/> which is a
documentation file. The namespace should be one of:
http://purl.org/dc/terms/
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/
http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.0/
Looking at how Dublin Core is being used on the page -- in particular,
literals for dc:creator and dc:publisher -- I'd suggest using the older
<http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/> namespace URI.
--
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
|