Hello,
Dan says that some X11 implementations are better than others (or at
least, so it seems). Dan is currently using XQuartz version 2.3.2.1 and
that seems ok (but he probably doesn't use Analysis as much as you).
Having said that, he just tried 2.3.2.2 today and got some horrid glX
errors, so he went back to 2.3.2.1.
Wayne
On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Patrick van der Wel wrote:
> So there is nothing I can do about it? It happened to me twice, yesterday.
>
> Patrick
>
>
> On Jul 14, 2009, at 10:55 AM, Wayne Boucher wrote:
>
>> OSX (esp. 10.5) and X11 do not seem to get on with each other very well.
>> Dan says this happens to him now and again but not very reproducibly (I'm
>> on 10.4, which seems to be better, or perhaps it's just that I don't use
>> Analysis enough).
>>
>> Wayne
>>
>> On Mon, 13 Jul 2009, Patrick van der Wel wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just had Analysis crash with the following error message:
>>>
>>> X Error of failed request: BadIDChoice (invalid resource ID chosen for
>>> this connection)
>>> Major opcode of failed request: 149 (RENDER)
>>> Minor opcode of failed request: 4 (RenderCreatePicture)
>>> Resource id in failed request: 0x1ebdfb7
>>> Serial number of failed request: 28610593
>>> Current serial number in output stream: 28610678
>>>
>>> I had noticed that the program's response had been getting ever slower,
>>> but otherwise there was nothing unusual going on. Any thoughts?
>>>
>>> This is Analysis v2.07 running on the Mac OSX 10.5.7.
>>>
>>>
>>> Patrick
>
|