On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, David Berry wrote:
> 2009/7/15 Peter W. Draper <[log in to unmask]>:
> > On Tue, 14 Jul 2009, Tim Jenness wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 15 Jul 2009, Peter W. Draper wrote:
> >>
> >> > I also suspect that the elephant in the room against 1D FITS is handling
> >> > the WCS information. That's considerably simplified using a table.
> >> >
> >>
> >> but AST handles it no problem :-;
> >>
> >> So it's been decided that everything is a LutMap?
> >
> > Yes. For now anyway. No doubt given time this will get back to where we
> > were (requires STC they'll say).
>
> But there must be *some* way of deciding what he values in the table
> represent???
Yes, that's what STC will define, surely. At present we have units, with
STC we'll get back to all the other missing stuff as well.
|