JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MCG Archives


MCG Archives

MCG Archives


MCG@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MCG Home

MCG Home

MCG  July 2009

MCG July 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Statement from the NPG concerning the situation with Wikimedia

From:

Nick Poole <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Museums Computer Group <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 15 Jul 2009 20:32:09 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (75 lines)

Dear MCGers,

Please see below the email from Bernard Horrocks at the NPG and the associated Prepared Statement from the NPG Press Office.

All best,

Nick


Dear Members,

National Portrait Gallery (NPG) and Wikipedia

You may have seen articles in the press reporting that the NPG is 'suing' Wikipedia.  As a number of you will already be aware, these reports of 'suing' are not quite accurate.  Rather, the Gallery has issued a lawyer's letter, as it is very concerned about high resolution rather than low resolution images having been appropriated for the Wikipedia site without permission.

The Gallery charges fees to allow publication of high resolution images.  The posting of these high resolution images in a Commons repository therefore directly threatens the Gallery's income.  This income enables the Gallery to digitise further material for the public good.  So actions like Wikipedia's could be regarded ultimately as self-defeating.

Wikipedia's rather nebulous structure (consisting largely of thousands of volunteers and only a handful of staff) makes it hard to find - and contact - responsible individuals with the necessary authority.  The Gallery initially wrote to Wikipedia's legal team ('designated agent') but received no response.  It then contacted Wikipedia administrators who referred the Gallery back to the legal team.  Again, the Gallery received no response.  The Gallery's only course of action, then, to safeguard its assets, was to try to resolve this with the individual, Derrick Coetzee.  Mr Coetzee is not an employee of Wikipedia - he is a volunteer having the status of 'Wikipedia administrator' - although this status appears to have been revoked for the time being.

The Gallery's invitation to Wikipedia to resolve this issue remains open.

Please find attached the NPG Press Statement on this issue.  If anyone would like any further detail please contact me direct.

All best wishes,

----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bernard Horrocks
Copyright Officer
National Portrait Gallery  St Martin's Place  London WC2H OHE


NATIONAL PORTRAIT GALLERY PRESS OFFICE
PREPARED STATEMENTS
July 2009

Position Statement: the National Portrait Gallery images and Wikipedia Internet Encyclopaedia

The National Portrait Gallery is very strongly committed to giving access to its Collection. In the past five years the Gallery has spent around £1 million digitising its Collection to make it widely available for study and enjoyment. We have so far made available on our website more than 60,000 digital images, which have attracted millions of users, and we believe this extensive programme is of great public benefit.

The Gallery supports Wikipedia in its aim of making knowledge widely available and we would be happy for the site to use our low-resolution images, sufficient for most forms of public access, subject to safeguards. However, in March 2009 over 3000 high-resolution files were appropriated from the National Portrait Gallery website and published on Wikipedia without permission.

The Gallery is very concerned that potential loss of licensing income from the high-resolution files threatens its ability to reinvest in its digitisation programme and so make further images available. It is one of the Gallery's primary purposes to make as much of the Collection available as possible for the public to view.

Digitisation involves huge costs including research, cataloguing, conservation and highly-skilled photography. Images then need to be made available on the Gallery website as part of a structured and authoritative database.

To date, Wikipedia has not responded to our requests to discuss the issue and so the National Portrait Gallery has been obliged to issue a lawyer's letter. The Gallery remains willing to enter into a dialogue with Wikipedia.

 National Portrait Gallery, London


Nick Poole
Chief Executive
Collections Trust

The new BSI/Collections Trust Code of Practice for Cultural Collections Management and the accompanying Collections Management: A Practical Guide are now available via Collections Link - http://www.collectionslink.org.uk/news/004912.html

Registered offices: 22 Hills Road, Cambridge, CB2 1JP

Registered Charity no. 273984

Telephone (switchboard): 01223 316 028

www.collectionstrust.org.uk
www.collectionslink.org.uk
www.culturalpropertyadvice.gov.uk
www.discs-uk.info


****************************************************************
For mcg information visit the mcg website at
http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk.
To manage your subscription to this email list visit
http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk/email.shtml
****************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager