JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  June 2009

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING June 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: documenting and archiving - results archive 2020

From:

Janis Jefferies <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Janis Jefferies <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 18 Jun 2009 08:21:52 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (246 lines)

Please note that the last Thursday club of this term will be.

THURSDAY CLUB, THURSDAY JUNE 25th 2009

Goldsmiths, University of London
Ben Pimlott lecture theatre
7pm start

All welcome and free

Theorizing Performance in Virtual Spaces

The presentation will describe and analyze the theoretical issues for
Performance Studies posed by new genres of performance in virtual
environments, such as Second Life. We will also demonstrate
the technological modifications to Second Life that our team has developed
to facilitate a new form of mediated performance and outline the
experiments that we have initiated to take advantage of this technology.
Utilizing a panel discussion format involving live participants and
avatars in Second Life, our presentation aims to shed light on the unique
opportunities provided by virtual environments in formulating new
approaches to theorizing contemporary performance practices.   A
fundamental premise of the discipline of Performance Studies is that
theory is enlivened and most rigorously tested when it hits the ground in
practice.  We at Georgia Tech have a particular opportunity to test that
premise, because our institution is a meeting ground for technological
practice and critical reflection.

The Augmented Environments Lab (AEL) and the Wesley Center for New Media
are in the process of developing technological modifications to Second
Life that will facilitate a new form of mediated performance, one in which
actors and audience share a performance space that is both physical and
virtual.  We are already planning performances that will take advantage of
this technology: these performances will be a negotiation between
professional improv artists in the city of Atlanta and technologists here
at Georgia Tech.

Members of the team presenting are

Kathryn Farley, Prof. Jay Bolter, Professor Michael Nitsche and grad.
student Jenifer Vandagriff.


Web site for the project: http://arsecondlife.gvu.gatech.edu




On Wed, June 17, 2009 3:13 pm, Kelli Dipple wrote:
> It's an interesting discussion.
>
>
> Often times net art is more than just a website. Works are often
> conceptual or performative, involving elements that are not well captured
> within the browser interface. Take some of the early works commissioned by
> Tate, for example.
>
>
> Looking at the archived websites linked to from the Tate website it is
> difficult to understand the performative intervention that Graham Harwood's
> work 'Uncomfortable Proximity' executed, when it randomly opened in place
> of the formal Tate site, for every 10th visitor. The work was a replica of
> the Tate site as it existed then, with poignant variations to the imagery
> and text within. However the Tate site has changed a lot in terms of the
> way it looks and navigates, 8 years on and this relationship is lost in
> the current archive, unless one reads the accompanying text.
>
> There is no documentation of Susan Collin's year long performance as the
> Director of 'Tate in Space', although a text-based interview reveals the
> act. This project was launched at the time, with a media release stating,
> as a fact, that Tate was planning to launch an actual Tate in space. There
> was an architecture competition, live forums, satellite sightings etc...
> Even though we still, on occasion, receive enquiries
> about this project, as if it were a real thing (believe it or not), I think
> that much of the narrative and irony involved in this work is in danger of
> being lost in archive as a website on its own.
>
> Every work is different and of course many net art pieces are complete
> within the browser. It would be difficult to evolve a blanket strategy that
> would be suitable for all works. In each case a different sort of
> evidence/reference/archive/documentation may be required.
>
> I think documentation is an important consideration in commissioning new
> work and yet it raises interesting philosophical questions around notions
> of authenticity and how one might define what the work is. Difficulties
> can also arise in terms of ownership, depending on who produces the
> documentation. One can employ open content models, but ultimately this
> decision is in the hands of the artist/author of the original work.
>
> Documentation can be many things... anecdotal, technical, descriptive...
>
>
>
> It is rarely impartial though. An authoritive, tightly edited film about
> an artist's work, compared to a more informal interview, a recording of the
> artist speaking in front of a live audience, in discussion with an
> interviewer or a conservator, or a bunch of mobile phone videos uploaded
> to YouTube by audience members will all give different insights into the
> work.
>
> The notion of a networked model put forward in Annet's summery is an
> important point. Centralisation and autonomy can put things at greater
> risk.
>
> Ironically methods employed by other sectors, say archaeology, often
> involve digitization. Capturing a stone wall that has lasted a million
> years, for example, and transcoding it into a short-lived digital format.
> I can't help but view the irony in this, but these activities
> are often tightly linked to issues of access rather than preservation.
>
> I am struck by the idea proposed in Annet's outline of thinking about
> 'permanent access' rather than 'digital preservation'. Is access about
> permenace? (certainly not in the case above) / or indeed, is permenace
> about access?
>
> Challenging our established notions of permenace may well be useful.
>
>
> Kelli
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Curating digital art - www.crumbweb.org
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Caroline Langill
> Sent: 17 June 2009 12:58
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: Re: [NEW-MEDIA-CURATING] documenting and archiving - results
> archive 2020
>
> I think Myron is correct, there is something needed which moves beyond
> classification and nomenclature.
>
> It is for this reason I did extensive interviews with the artists whose
> work I chose for my Shifting Polarities project. For those of you not
> familiar with it, I named exemplary works of Canadian electronic media art
> from the 1970s and 1980s. The interviews contextualize the artist's
> practice and then offer anecdotal, as well as important historical
> information, about the chosen work's conceptualization and fabrication.
> Availability of these interviews online (for how long though is a
> question) enables scholars to situate the work beyond a taxonomic
> description.
>
> Also, and this goes back to a conversation I had with Simon Werrett on
> the Banff shuttle at Refresh!, works could be kept in a degraded
> dysfunctional state in order to keep the technical components available.
> Simon pointed out that for scientific historians the components of
> scientific instruments - even fasteners - contain important historial
> information which speak very specifically about the historical narrative
> of the instrument. We could apply similar thinking to new media works
> which are no longer active.
>
> Finally, we lost an important artist in Canada recently. Juan Geuer, who
> worked with optics, lasers, and seismic sensors to produce exquisite
> real-time projections of the earth's activity, to name one part of his
> practice, passed away on May 2nd at the age of 92. Now, Juan was active
> until the day he died, so there is a vast body of work which now needs to
> be dealt with, placed in museums, etc. One of his works is permanently
> installed in a basement gallery of the Ottawa Art Gallery. The work, Al
> Asnaan, has a very sensitive horizontal pendulum which
> senses the earth's movement, but also the movement of the audience in the
> gallery (this work is very close to the earth's surface since Ottawa sits
> on the Canadian Shield). The work is very complex to install and Juan,
> because he lived for so long, was solely responsible for installing and
> maintaining the work. Anyone can see what is coming here. The gallery
> realized, due to his advancing years, that they would need to have a
> record of his knowledge, beyond the owner's manual accompanying the work.
> They had the foresight to make a videotape (is
> that what we call it now?) of Juan installing the work, two weeks prior to
> his passing. The video document will provide details which will be
> integral to an understanding of the work, not just in terms of setting it
> up in the gallery, but also how the artist's hand produced, and maintained
> a relationship with it.
>
> I expand on with some of these questions in an upcoming article in
> Convergence.
>
>
> Here are some links related to what I've been talking about above:
>
>
> Shifting Polarities:
> http://www.fondation-langlois.org/html/e/page.php?NumPage=1949
>
>
> Juan Geuer: www.juangeuer.com (make sure you scroll down beyond Juan's
> photograph to get to the website link).
>
> All for now,
>
>
> Caroline
>
>
>> Date: Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:12:04 -0500
>> From: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [NEW-MEDIA-CURATING] documenting and archiving - results
>> archive 2020 To: [log in to unmask]
>>
>>
>> I've been following along and recall that we've had similar
>> discussions in the past, often cropping up when we've attempted to come
>> to terms with just what net art is.  We do of course need techniques for
>> descriptive documentation of projects.  But I think there's a need for
>> more than just taxonomic and technical description.
>
>> If the physical presence of a work is going to disappear or almost
>> disappear, it's important to have descriptive responses which recreate
> the presence of
>> the work and the contexts which informed it.   This would take some
>> curatorial management, but the tools are there for involving audience
>> and developers.
>>
>> Myron turner
>>
>>
>> Sarah Cook wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Sandra Fauconnier and Gaby Wijers at NIMK: how has involving the
>>> public in curatorial selection of works in the archive (through the new
>>> mediatheque, or curator for a day project, for instance) led to new
>>> ways of thinking about preservation and documentation of the works?
>>> Can you tell us a bit about inside-installations.org and the
>>> OASIS project (Open Archiving System with Internet Sharing)?
>>>
>>>
>>> Aymeric Mansoux at GOTO10: do you think the idea of 'open-sourcing'
>>> documentation tasks, by distributing them to the makers/developers, is
>>> a good solution?
>>>
>>> any thoughts from any others would be great too, thanks sarah
>>>
>> --
>>
>>
>> _____________________
>> Myron Turner
>> http://www.room535.org
>> http://www.mturner.org
>> http://net18reaching.org/cityscapes
>> _________________________________________________________
>> Searchable Database of Art and New Media News Feeds Over 500,000 news
>> items supplied in response to queries http://net18reaching.org/artrss
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager