Eugene,
Ah yes, that makes perfect sense.
And yes, I did end up using a second level EV modeling. This has not only
helped with my project, but has also helped another student who is analyzing
a different portion of this data set. So it's been great!
Thank you for all your help and the prompt replies!
Cheers,
Carlos
On Fri, 5 Jun 2009 16:03:53 +0100, Eugene Duff <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Glad the results are interesting Carlos. So I'm guessing you used a second
>level ev modelling the variations across individuals in the proportion of
>correct anwers? If so, a negative contrast of this ev would identify
>regions that tend to be more activated in subjects that were getting more
>answers incorrect (equivalently, the regions were less activated in subjects
>getting more correct).
>Eugene
>
|