Hello,
Tim thinks that this was fixed in 2.0.7 and it's not a simple one line fix
in one file. The problem was that in v2 of the API there are lots of
things that are now sets rather than lists, and if you forget to use a
sorted version of the set then comparing items between two sets becomes
problematic, which is what happened here. So although it is 1H and 15N
that are wrong for you, it could be something else for someone else, or
even for you on another computer. But it's not the graphical interface
that is wrong, it's the code that uses it that is (or was) wrong.
Wayne
On Mon, 22 Jun 2009, Brian Smith wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We've identified a situation with assignment tolerances (v2.0.6 fully
> updated). Both in Link Peak Lists and in the general setup of tolerances
> between spectra the 1H and 15N tolerances are being applied the wrong way
> round. So for us the 1H tolerance is applied to the 15N dimensions and the
> 15N to the 1H. Anybody else seen this, or have we stumbled on this because
> some of our triple resonance expts are 1H,15N,13C and others 1H,13C,15N ? As
> far as I can tell the Experiment types are setup correctly for all of them.
>
> Brian
>
> Dr. Brian O. Smith ---------------------- B Smith at bio gla ac uk
> Division of Molecular & Cellular Biology,
> Faculty of Biomedical & Life Sciences,
> Joseph Black Building, University of Glasgow, Glasgow G12 8QQ, UK.
> Tel: 0141 330 5167/6459/3089 Fax: 0141 330 4600
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> The University of Glasgow, charity number SC004401
>
|