The requirement sounds a bit like the Rotisserie project at Harvard...
http://h2oproject.law.harvard.edu/rotisserie.html
John
On 15 May 2009, at 09:22, Paul A Chin wrote:
> Hi There,
>
> What you are suggesting is a peer review tool and unfortunately
> WebPA is a peer assessment tool. A peer review tool would allow you
> to do exactly what you want to do as outlined below. I have come
> across a number of both tools, both with differing levels of
> functionality but as far as I know there is no single tool that can
> act as an effective peer review tool *and* a peer assessment tool.
> So, you could either use two tools to meet your needs (could be
> messy and time consuming?) or perhaps a workaround with WebPA. You
> could use a third party tool (blog, wiki for example?) to share
> anonymous documents which the students provide feedback. They then
> use WebPA to score and these marks are fed back to the student. Just
> a quick suggestion at least.
>
> Regards
>
> Paul
>
>
> From: WebPA Project [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
> Nicola Wilkinson
> Sent: 15 May 2009 08:39
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: FW: webpa
>
>
>
> From: Imran Ali [mailto:[log in to unmask]]
> Sent: 14 May 2009 16:51
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: webpa
>
> Hi Nic
> I just wondered if it would be possible to forward the message below
> to the WebPa mailing group, I am subscribed and receive all the
> group emails but can not post anything. Every time i try to send an
> email It gets rejected and tells me I’m not subscribed.
> Hi all
> Juts forwarding this message on behalf of a colleague.
> Dear forum,
> I am investigating the use of WebPA and wondered if the following
> proposal if possible with this software. I have 150 first year
> students who I would like to familiarise with our marking system and
> at the same time develop their critical analysis of others' work.
> Thus, if it was possible they would submit a copy of some formative
> coursework electronically, and in return they would receive an
> anonymous piece of course work that they would be required to review
> and then electronically submit back into the system. The reviewed
> piece of work would then be accessible by the original author who
> would subsequently benefit from the comments provided by his/her
> peer. Ideally the allocation of coursework would be randomised. This
> process would be repeated 4 times across the module and at the end I
> could tally how many reviews were carried out by each student? Is
> this possible with WebPA and if not what limitations are there to
> this procedure....are there alternative procedures that would match
> this purpose? Thanks in advance for your help and suggestion.
> Luke
>
>
> NOTICE
>
> This message and any files transmitted with it is intended for the
> addressee only and may contain information that is confidential or
> privileged. Unauthorised use is strictly prohibited. If you are not
> the addressee, you should not read, copy, disclose or otherwise use
> this message, except for the purpose of delivery to the addressee.
>
> Any views or opinions expressed within this e-mail are those of the
> author and do not necessarily represent those of Coventry University.
>
> *****************************************************************************************
> To view the terms under which this email is distributed, please go
> to http://www.hull.ac.uk/legal/email_disclaimer.html
> *****************************************************************************************
|