I know, Doug. I was just having fun. It's what comes before that's
the real meat. What exactly is she talking about? That she engaged in
a civil action against the university for not protecting her from
Walcott's harassment so that he could have his day in court and prove
that he hadn't harassed her? When it should have been clear to a
child that, even if any of that made any sense, the university's
lawyers would never allow him to testify in the unlikely event that
it didn't settle.
Mark
At 11:56 AM 5/15/2009, you wrote:
>Mark,
>
>to a degree I am with you here, but there are many who believe this,
>not just this one woman. And, in his way, he does write very well
>(it's just not my way, nor yours).
>
>Doug
>On 15-May-09, at 7:14 AM, Mark Weiss wrote:
>
>>Either the woman, or the editor, is deranged. From my point of view
>>that she thinks Walcott is the world's greatest poet is a further
>>symptom.
>
>Douglas Barbour
>[log in to unmask]
>
>http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/
>
>Latest books:
>Continuations (with Sheila E Murphy)
>http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp?LID=41&bookID=664
>Wednesdays'
>http://abovegroundpress.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-from-aboveground-press_10.html
>
>and this is 'life' and we owe at least this much
>contemplation to our western fact: to Rise,
>Decline, Fall, to futility and larks,
>to the bright crustaceans of the oversky.
>
> Phyllis Webb
|