JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MINING-HISTORY Archives


MINING-HISTORY Archives

MINING-HISTORY Archives


mining-history@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY  May 2009

MINING-HISTORY May 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Dynamite Fumes

From:

Peter Bell <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The mining-history list.

Date:

Sun, 10 May 2009 15:32:58 +0930

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (114 lines)

Sorry for coming in late, but I’ve been away from my office for a  
fortnight, and could read emails but not reply to the list.   I think  
the answer to Roger’s question about well-sinkers succumbing to  
dynamite fumes is not so much about what they could smell, but what  
they COULDN”T smell.

Well-sinkers using dynamite as early as 1880-1884 must have been very  
new to it, and would have been accustomed to using blasting powder  
(black powder) for most of their careers.  The aftermaths of the  
explosions of the two blasting agents were very different.  A black  
powder explosion creates an opaque dirty-white cloud of smoke, soot,  
powdered rock and water vapour, with a lot of sulphur dioxide  
present.   (Nineteenth century battles on land or sea were mostly  
fought by men with soot-blackened faces in clouds of blinding smoke,  
amid the noxious stink of burnt sulphur.)  No well-sinker would  
descend into a well full of that.  I presume well-sinkers customarily  
laid a black powder charge just before knocking off for the day, and  
came back next morning to muck out the rubble.  The explosion  
products of blasting powder looked, smelled and tasted toxic, and any  
sensible person would avoid them.

However, from the 1870s on, the new generation of Alfred Nobel’s  
explosive agents: Dynamite, Gelignite, Monobel etc, were marketed  
with a number of advantages including being “smokeless”.  That meant,  
as Rick Stewart described, once the rock dust settled, the explosion  
products were a wispy brown smoke, and it would be tempting for a  
labourer on piece-work to descend into the well and go back to work a  
few minutes later.  But dynamite’s explosion products include carbon  
monoxide (toxic), carbon dioxide (suffocating) and nitrogen dioxide  
(toxic).  Carbon monoxide and dioxide are both transparent and  
undetectable by human smell or taste, and insidious in their effects;  
the victim simply experiences lethargy and sleepiness.  Nitrogen  
dioxide probably forms most of the brown fumes, and is acrid in smell  
and taste, but relatively benign compared to sulphur dioxide.

Crucially for well-sinkers, both carbon dioxide and nitrogen dioxide  
are heavier than air, and would sit in the bottom of an unventilated  
well for days.  Carbon monoxide is about the same density as air, so  
it too would disperse only slowly.  The deeper the well, the slower  
the dispersal.  Unless there was some vigorous mechanical method of  
ventilating the well, a well-sinker going back to work too soon after  
a dynamite explosion would start to feel strangely sleepy after a  
while.  If he recognised the symptoms, he would yell for help or  
climb the ladder very quickly.  If not, he would probably just sit  
down to have a little sleep, forever.  I would guess the victims  
Roger has recorded were mostly new to dynamite, and working alone in  
deep wells.  There was a similar rash of fatalities in the early  
twentieth century when internal combustion engines came into use for  
pumping small mines.  Many were placed with their exhausts too close  
to the shaft, and miners underground died in an invisible pool of  
carbon dioxide and monoxide .

  Peter Bell

On 03/05/2009, at 7:24 PM, Rick Stewart, Morwellham Quay Mine Manager  
wrote:

> Nitro glycerine based explosives certainly have an almondy/  
> marizpany smell
> before detonation.
>
> The post explosion nasties would include nitrous fumes which appear  
> as a
> brownish wispy smoke and are fairly obvious.  I suspect that the  
> real killer
> is not the dynamite fumes but carbon monoxide which is a by product of
> explosive use and is often referred to as after damp.  Also present  
> may be
> increased levels of carbon dioxide, known as black damp or choke damp,
> which, whilst not poisonous in itself,  is harmful in that it replaces
> oxygen and, therefore, has a suffocating effect.  Both carbon  
> monoxide and
> carbon dioxide are odourless and colourless.
>
> Rick Stewart
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Roger Baden Bradford" <[log in to unmask]>
> To: <[log in to unmask]>
> Sent: Sunday, May 03, 2009 11:14 PM
> Subject: Dynamite Fumes
>
>
> Fellow Listers
> I wonder if some one can tell me what the fumes of dynamite smell  
> like!!!!
> I should explain that in my researching I have come across a number of
> wellsinker's death's from suffocation, due to dynamite fumes, in  
> wells in
> the period 1880-1884.
> I have recorded dynamite exploding from a distance, but on  
> examining the
> site minuets later can not recollect any particular odour!! {in a  
> quarry}.
> My interest is WHY if the smell is strong, would the wellsinker  
> return too
> soon after the charge went off!!!!!!!
> I have faint memories that Dynamite Sticks had the faint odour of
> Marzipan!!!!!
> Can anyone please advise me re' the above.
> Take Care.
> Roger B Bradford of South Australia
>
>

_________________
Dr Peter Bell
Historical Research Pty Ltd
PO Box 574, Goodwood  SA  5034
Phone (08) 8373 1900
Mobile 0407 793 652
email <[log in to unmask]>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager