JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LDHEN Archives


LDHEN Archives

LDHEN Archives


LDHEN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LDHEN Home

LDHEN Home

LDHEN  May 2009

LDHEN May 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: [Fwd: Readability]

From:

[log in to unmask]

Reply-To:

[log in to unmask]

Date:

Mon, 11 May 2009 13:29:44 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (121 lines)

Colleagues

There seems to me to be three different issues here:
1) the production of text that can be 'easily' read and understood by persons who, for whatever reason, have difficulties ("People who lack confidence in these crucial skills", as the NIACE leaflet says);
2) the kind of text that students in higher education are/ should be producing (who may be "worried about the complexity of their work..." as Becka puts it).
3) appropriateness of text for intended audience, expressed by Alan as "How can you be confident that you are writing at a level that is appropriate for your audience?"

It also seems to me that the third set of issues subsumes the other two, ie
a) when writing for prospective HE students, and students in their early stages, we should take particular care to ensure 'readability' taking account of the concept of reading age and methods for assessing this when writing for such people (eg using SMOG and other indices);
b) as students progress through higher education, they **should** engage with texts that are more complex, so having higher SMOG, Flesch-Kincaid,  etc indices, *and** they **should** be producing texts that are also more complex, because these address issues that themselves are more complex.
To use the newspaper reference in Alan's message, as students progress through HE they should be able to move from Sun, Mail (Mirror) level to that of Guardian/ telegraph/ Times etc.

There are, of course, other factors to take into account. The ability to use punctuation correctly is vital: a student who writes several sections of text running to 50+ words between full stops will get a relatively high SMOG rating simply on sentence length even though the sentences may read as nonsense.
The chain of reasoning is also important: effective writing takes the reader along a path of reasoning, using particular kinds of connecting words/ phrases such as 'because', 'therefore', 'moreover', 'in addition', 'despite', 'nevertheless'. This requires the student-writer to frame their own thinking in such logical structures, and to be able to discern these (or lack of them!) in the writing of others.
And any text exist in relation to other texts, so being able to cite other texts, and to recognise where this is appropriate and why it might be so, is important.

All this suggests that the process of becoming a student, then moving on through to becoming a graduate, is a form of apprenticeship - a social encounter that not well captured by the currently dominant ideology of learnerism and the possessive-instrumentalist view of skills.

Now ... wonder what my SMOG score is ....?

Regards

Len

-----Original Message-----
From: learning development in higher education network [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Becka Currant
Sent: 09 May 2009 07:25
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: [Fwd: Readability]

I thought this tool was quite interesting and may be of use for students
worried about the complexity of their work...

-------- Original Message --------
Subject:        Readability
Date:   09 May 2009 02:05:51 +0100
From:   [log in to unmask]
Reply-To:       [log in to unmask]
To:     [log in to unmask]



Message from Alan Tuckett, Director, NIACE



Dear Colleagues



Did you know that a "typical" editorial in The Sun has a (SMOG)
readability level of under 14, The Daily Express is under 16 but The
Telegraph and The Guardian both score over 17?



How can you be confident that you are writing at a level that is
appropriate for your audience?  We have been working with Professor
Colin Harrison at Nottingham University to develop a new tool, which is
now on the NIACE website that will help you to establish the
"readability level" of any text instantly.  There is also a downloadable
leaflet which will help you to interpret the readability score given,
and provide more information about how to present text so that it is
easier to read.



You can find both the readability calculator and the leaflet here:
Readability | NIACE
<http://www.niace.org.uk/development-research/readability>



To celebrate ALW we thought you might like to test a small piece of your
writing'



Please also flag it up to colleagues and organisations in your networks.
We are hoping that it will bring users to our website.



Yours sincerely

Alan





/Sent by Alan Tuckett/

/Director/

/NIACE /




--
Becka Currant
Head of Learner Development and Student Engagement
University of Bradford
BD7 1DP
Tel: 01274 236821
Mob: 07917 241214
Email: [log in to unmask]
Web: http://developme.ning.com www.brad.ac.uk/developme www.brad.ac.uk/lss/learnerdevelopment


Consider the environment. Please don't print this e-mail unless you really need to.

This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the addressee and may also be privileged or exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If you are not the addressee, or have received this e-mail in error, please notify the sender immediately, delete it from your system and do not copy, disclose or otherwise act upon any part of this email or its attachments.

Internet communications are not guaranteed to be secure or virus-free. Roehampton University does not accept responsibility for any loss arising from unauthorised access to, or interference with, any Internet communications by any third party, or from the transmission of any viruses.

Any opinion or other information in this e-mail or its attachments that does not relate to the business of Roehampton University is personal to the sender and is not given or endorsed by Roehampton University.

Roehampton University is a company limited by guarantee incorporated in England under number 5161359. Registered Office: Grove House, Roehampton Lane, London SW15 5PJ. An exempt charity.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager