JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for INT-BOUNDARIES Archives


INT-BOUNDARIES Archives

INT-BOUNDARIES Archives


INT-BOUNDARIES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

INT-BOUNDARIES Home

INT-BOUNDARIES Home

INT-BOUNDARIES  May 2009

INT-BOUNDARIES May 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

eadline day

From:

"Oude Elferink, A. (Alex)" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Oude Elferink, A. (Alex)

Date:

Mon, 18 May 2009 09:18:09 +0200

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (127 lines)

Dear Martin,
Maybe as a clarification to your e-mail, in my view in legal terms there
is no precedence of the EEZ/continental shelf within 200 nautical miles
over the continental shelf beyond 200 nautical miles and a "zone-locked"
State has the same continental shelf entitlement. The extent of the
continental shelf of neighboring States will have to be addressed
through bilateral agreements in such a case (just as in any other case
of overlapping entitlements).
Best regards,


Alex


_______________________________________________ 
Alex G. Oude Elferink 
Netherlands Institute for the Law of the Sea (NILOS) 
School of Law 
Utrecht University 
Achter Sint Pieter 200 
3512 HT Utrecht 
The Netherlands 
European Union
tel: .. 31 (0)30 2537033 
fax: .. 31 (0)30 2537073 
email: [log in to unmask]  
_______________________________________________ 

 


-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: International boundaries discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] Namens Martin Pratt
Verzonden: zondag 17 mei 2009 20:52
Aan: [log in to unmask]
Onderwerp: Re: deadline day

Dear David,

I was using the term zone-locked to refer to those states which - at
least on the face of it - will not have continental shelf beyond 200
nautical miles because in all directions their entitlement to
continental shelf overlaps with the entitlements to continental shelf of
neighbouring states whose coasts are closer than 400 nautical miles. 

I say 'on the face of it'  because several ostensibly zone-locked states
have made submissions to the CLCS. I imagine that all such submissions
will be protested by neighbouring states with overlapping entitlements,
and will therefore probably not be considered by the Commission. I doubt
that there will be many more submissions by zone-locked states but I
don't think we can rule out the possibility completely.

m a r t i n


-----Original Message-----
From: International boundaries discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of [log in to unmask]
Sent: 17 May 2009 17:55
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [INT-BOUNDARIES] deadline day

For the amateurs on the list: what is "zone-locked"?

David Phillips
San Francisco

-----Original Message-----
From: International boundaries discussion list
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Martin Pratt
Sent: Sunday, May 17, 2009 4:31 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: deadline day


Dear colleagues,

By my count there are five States which (i) became parties to UNCLOS
before 13 May 1999, (ii) are not zone-locked, and (iii) have not
provided at least preliminary information to the CLCS, namely: Antigua
and Barbuda, The Bahamas, Guatemala, the Marshall Islands and Nauru. My
sense is that of these five States only The Bahamas might have a
physical continental shelf extending beyond 200 nautical miles, but I am
open to correction on that point.

Equatorial Guinea submitted preliminary information to the CLCS on 14
May, technically missing its ten-year deadline by a day. I don't suppose
that it will be penalised when its full submission is eventually
considered by the Commission!

There are ten States Parties which are not zone-locked whose 10-year
clock is still ticking: Nicaragua (deadline = May 2010), Maldives
(November 2010), Bangladesh (July 2011), Madagascar (August 2011),
Tuvalu (December 2012), Kiribati (February 2013), Canada (November
2013), Denmark (November 2014), Morocco (May 2017) and Liberia
(September 2018). Colombia, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, El Salvador,
Peru and the USA are non-zone-locked which have yet to become parties to
UNCLOS. 

Regards,

m a r t i n

==================================
Martin Pratt
Director of Research
International Boundaries Research Unit
Department of Geography
Durham University
Durham DH1 3LE
United Kingdom

Tel: +44 (0)191 334 1964
Fax: +44 (0)191 334 1962
[log in to unmask]
www.dur.ac.uk/ibru
==================================
  

On Thu, 14 May 2009 09:17:05 +0200, Oude Elferink, A. (Alex)
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>By the way, would you happen to know if there is any State which was 
>facing the deadline of 12 May 2009  that has not made a submissions or 
>submitted preliminary information?

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager