Hi,
So, it is just my case or a common one?
I'll try reanalyz my data later, hope there would be no difference in
group result:)
Thanks
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 7:01 PM, Matthew Webster
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> Hi,
> It looks like the estimated motion-correction parameters for your data
> differ slightly between the two versions, which leads on to subtle
> differences in the subsequent steps ( BET etc ) giving a few extra
> super-threshold voxels. It's possible these differences would be less
> apparent for corrected voxel/cluster threshold rather than uncorrected.
>
> Many Regards
>
> Matthew
>
>> Hi,
>> Can you tar up the results directories for both 4.1.2 and 4.1.3 and
>> upload them to
>>
>> http://www.fmrib.ox.ac.uk/cgi-bin/upload.cgi
>>
>> and let me know the 6-digit reference number?
>>
>> Many Regards
>>
>> Matthew
>>>
>>> Dear folks,
>>>
>>> I also tried feat first level analysis with 4.1.3, I found there were
>>> some mismatch with 4.1.2. In the attached gif file, red denotes result
>>> from 4.1.2 and blue denotes result from 4.1.3, which should I trust?
>>> Is it more strict in 4.1.3?
>>>
>>> BTW, there are no soft link in lib files in 4.1.3_Centos5_32, ldconfig
>>> always complains.
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Best Regards
>>>
>>>
>>> National Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning
>>> Beijing Normal University
>>> Beijing, China. 100875
>>> Tel: +86-13811953774
>>> web: http://psychbrain.bnu.edu.cn
>>> ==============================================
>>> Welcome to MuDuo JinSheng BBS @ Beijing Normal University
>>> telnet://bbs.mdjs.org
>>> http://bbs.mdjs.org
>>> <Screenshot.gif>
>>
>
--
Best Regards
National Key Laboratory of Cognitive Neuroscience and Learning
Beijing Normal University
Beijing, China. 100875
Tel: +86-13810154455
web: http://psychbrain.bnu.edu.cn
==============================================
Welcome to MuDuo JinSheng BBS @ Beijing Normal University
telnet://bbs.mdjs.org
http://bbs.mdjs.org
|