JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Archives


CRIT-GEOG-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM Home

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM  May 2009

CRIT-GEOG-FORUM May 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: CfP ISA 2010, Panel on "Liberal interventionism and reflections on the re-emergence of counterinsurgency" - complicity by language and preoccupation?

From:

tom wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

tom wengraf <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 14 May 2009 15:58:09 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (222 lines)

I'm very pleased to hear that you had intended your CfP to problematise a
whole 'body-of-doctrine/discourse' that I felt could be read as the body of
doctrine/discourse that the panel was meant to inhabit. 

I think that the grammatical ambiguity of the "it" and the use of the word
"reflect" in the original CfP didn't help you get the
problematic-questioning drive of your stated aim clearly in focus, at least
for me. The terms "problematic" and "problematise" and "problematisation" --
encouragingly strong in your response to my email -- were not present in the
CfP.

Many thanks for your clarification, and best wishes  for the panel
discussion!
 
Tom
 

-----Original Message-----
From: A forum for critical and radical geographers
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jan Bachmann
Sent: 14 May 2009 15:15
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: CfP ISA 2010, Panel on "Liberal interventionism and reflections
on the re-emergence of counterinsurgency" - complicity by language and
preoccupation?

Dear Tom, dear forum,

We are not sure if it is the right policy to engage in a discussion about
our panel proposal via the whole list. But since you disseminated your
critique to the whole forum, allow us to reply briefly to the same audience.

1.) Regarding your comment on the premise that Western security requires a
long-term occupation of non-Western spaces and the question if this is an
invitation to "free world academics".

Rather than being a prescription, this "premise" follows an analysis of
dominant rationalities in Western foreign-policy thinking.
Whole-of-government, inter-agency approaches and "winning hearts and minds"
campaigns are justified by a "necessary" long-term engagement in what have
been constructed as problematic (social) spaces. In contrast to your
suggestion, our intention is to call for a critical engagement with these
dominant assumptions as well as the techniques and practices that follow.


2.) Regarding your comments on agency and local struggles

We study programmes, rationalities, and practices which have become
hegemonic. However, by working discourse-theoretically, agency is of course
not denied. Since we argue that liberalism itself is a rationality of
governance this means that - rather than pointing at one agent, we highlight
the "liberal" consensus amongst a diversity of actors. This consensus
materialises in recent normative doctrines of "whole-of-government" or the
dominant truism of "there can be no security without development and vice
versa". We agree that a thorough study of struggles on the ground is
absolutely important and we also invite scholars who study local reactions
to these interventions in the name of liberalism. However, a panel proposal
has to be succinct and the analytical focus in this panel is on the
problematisation of "liberal" doctrines of intervention. Should you decide
to organise a panel that that focuses stronger on agency within such
interventions - this would be appreciated.

3.) Regarding your allegation of "complicity"

Again, the panel's intention is to problematise these "whole-of-governance"
alliances and calls for an analytical dissection of their practices. Being
aware of the power/knowledge nexus, the integration of so called "experts"
(such as the incorporation of anthropologists into the "human terrain team")
into strategies of Western governance is at the centre of the panel's
concern. It aims at stimulating a critical discussion about the role of
scholars in those projects. We feel puzzled and astonished by the
associations our call provoked. We strongly hope that we could clarify our
position.

Best

Jan



tom wengraf wrote:
> In the message below, directed to critical (?) geographers, I find
worrying
> ambiguities and omissions.
> What "starts from the premise that Western security requires...the
long-term
> interagency occupation" of the non-West? Is it the "panel" of
> not-so-critical geographers and other "freeworld academics"? In which
case,
> are we being invited to mirror the preoccupations of the occupying
imperial
> forces?
>
> I note the worrying lack of agency and concern of the terms in such
> formulations as
> *    "whole-of-government engagement is picking up on lessons", rather
> than governments and dominant regimes;
> *    "the military is now assigned a new totalising role" rather than
> "Dominant Western elites and NATO are determined to create a new
militarised
> quasi-civilian domination in the areas of new totalising (totalitarian?)
> subordination *    "pacification and stabilisation campaigns" rather than
> "destabilisation of elites and regimes not committed to subordination into
> Western domination. Not "containment" but wholesale occupation.
> *    "genuinely civilian affairs" rather than affairs which in liberal
> doctrine were treated as part of free non-state arrangements but are now
> becoming integrated into a post-liberal practice and doctrine of 'whole of
> governance' external domination.
> I note the lack of interest in the anti-domination struggle of
subordinated
> populations (and disappearance of the Soviet regime) which has led to the
> struggle for a new imperial re-subordination. There is no trace of
> conceptual distance from the new doctrines of imperial power; no trace of
> focal difference from anything that a mix of Davos/NATOpolitan elites
would
> want to have discussed while above all wanting to make sure was not
> discussed.
>
> When the proposal refers to the new practice, in the last line, by saying
it
> "incorporates long-term, inter-agency occupation by Western military
> personal, development workers and governmental experts", it seems to me
that
> the proposal itself "incorporates long-term inter-agency occupation" of
our
> heads and our persons and of 'scholarly subjectivity' and research
practice
> by such forces of the reconquista.... As experts, we are being invited to
> conceptual and practical complicity in the new order.... Project Camelot
> rises again as a sub-branch of a military-CIA operation, no longer just at
> the level of Latin America and worldwide....
>
> I would love to be given evidence that I was completely wrong!
>
> Best wishes
>  
> Tom
>  
> P.S.  Click on www.kiafrica.org. for our 'voluntourism + study trip
project'
> in rural Uganda.  ...  We've just revised the Kanaama Interactive
web-site,
> the pictures, and the things you can choose to do..... Read the very
> positive reports from our first year of visitors!....Did you know that
maths
> teaching in Ugandan schools is more advanced than in English ones? .....
> This year, UK students and researchers are going on study trips, using our
> Ugandan centre as a base for different individual and collective field
> projects.... Might you be interested? Click on www.kiafrica.org.  
> P.P.S. For a free electronic copy of the most recent version of the BNIM
> (the  biographic-narrative interpretive method of research interviewing
for
> lived experience) Short Guide and Detailed Manual , just click on
> [log in to unmask]  Please indicate your institutional affiliation and
the
> purpose for which you might envisage using BNIM's open-narrative
interviews,
> and  I'll send it straight away.
>  
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: A forum for critical and radical geographers
> [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jan Bachmann
> Sent: 14 May 2009 09:39
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: CfP - ISA 2010, Panel on "Liberal interventionism and reflections
> on the re-emergence of counterinsurgency"
>
> Apologies for Cross-Posting
>
> Call for Papers
> International Studies Association Annual Conference
> New Orleans, 17 - 20 February 2010
>
> Organisers: Colleen Bell & Jan Bachmann (University of Bristol)
>
> Panel Proposal on:
> Liberal Interventionism and Reflections on the Re-emergence of
> Counterinsurgency
>
> The contemporary terrain of military interventionism has evolved to
> incorporate and nuance the lessons of counterinsurgency, mirroring aspects
> of the pacification and stabilization campaigns popularized in the era of
> de-colonization struggles. Today, long-term whole-of-government engagement
> is picking up on these lessons across crisis zones. Even in regions in the
> global South where violent conflict is not necessarily present, the
military
> is now assigned a new totalising role in genuinely civilian affairs that
go
> beyond traditional counterinsurgency strategies.  This panel investigates
> this terrain of international security as emblematic of a renewed liberal
> strategy of war by other means. It begins from the premise that Western
> security requires not simply the cessation of violent hostilities, but the
> social, political and economic transformation of whole populations. It
> incorporates long-term, inter-agency occupation by Western military
> personal, development workers and governmental experts.
>
> Papers may reflect on:
>
> *    the different features of counterinsurgency such as campaigns of
> "cultural
> awareness", or "human terrain mappings",
> *    strategic alliances that have emerged such as whole-of-government,
> 3D and
> their manifestations in civil-military cooperation as well as on the
limits
> of these new totalising assemblages of governance,
> *    the requirements for new actors involved; from the incorporation of
> anthropologists to the culturally versatile combat-development expert,
> *    the designs of contingent  or sub-sovereignty alongside
> re-articulation of
> a Western sovereign frontier that works principally through techniques of
> containment,
> *    the rise of policing as a transnational, non-combat military
> expansion and
> possible (dis-) similiarities to previous ideas of police science (or
> Policeywissenschaft)
>
>
> Please send your abstracts by 28 May 2009 to Colleen Bell
> ([log in to unmask]) and Jan Bachmann ([log in to unmask]) 

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager