Sorry, disagree again: with the right plate type (e.g. SwissCi plates),
it's far far easier from sitting drop, because:
1. you don't have to muck around with flipping over the cover slip,
instead just cut the seal
2. you have more time, because your drop does not evaporate as quickly
(see earlier mail)
3. if the crystal sticks, just poke an acupuncture needle into the
plastic below it: off it pops.
phx
Simon Kolstoe wrote:
> It's also easier to fish the crystals out of the solution with a
> hanging drop.
>
> Simon
>
>
>
> On 1 May 2009, at 06:35, Debajyoti Dutta wrote:
>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> >From the experiance of mine I can tell you that the crystal size
>> sometimes matters between these two methods. Hanging drop may yield
>> bigger crystals than sitting drop, that may be due to the evaporation
>> rate(surface area). Hanging drop allow us to set different protocols
>> also like free interface diffusion, area covered by the drp etc.
>>
>> These informations are gained purely by experiance.
>>
>> cheers
>> Deb
>>
>>
>> On Thu, 30 Apr 2009 20:40:35 +0530 wrote
>> >I have noticed that a significant majority of crystallizations are
>> done in
>> >hanging- rather than sitting-drop configuration, and considering the
>> >significant extra labor involved in hanging drops, can only
>> understand this
>> >preference as a historical bias. I understand that sometimes one
>> technique
>> >works and not the other, but all things being equal, why is hanging
>> drop
>> >still "hanging around?" Any insights appreciated...
>> >
>> >Jacob Keller
>> >
>> >*******************************************
>> >Jacob Pearson Keller
>> >Northwestern University
>> >Medical Scientist Training Program
>> >Dallos Laboratory
>> >F. Searle 1-240
>> >2240 Campus Drive
>> >Evanston IL 60208
>> >lab: 847.491.2438
>> >cel: 773.608.9185
>> >email: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
>> >*******************************************
>> >
>> <http://sigads.rediff.com/RealMedia/ads/click_nx.ads/www.rediffmail.com/signatureline.htm@Middle?>
>>
>>
>
|