It's Jon, Jon, not Joe. It's Jon. I thought I only responded once.
Sorry, by the time you lot are up I've had a few.
A few thoughts that is - thoughts drown names.
I was just beginning to get into the dead end thing too - a few things
'pricked' my ears up.
Tim A.
On 9 Apr 2009, at 00:29, Judy Prince wrote:
> Fred Pollack a "little prick"? Somehow I doubt that.
> BTW, Tim: Who is this "Joe" you keep responding to?
>
> Best,
>
> Judy
>
> 2009/4/8 Mark Weiss <[log in to unmask]>
>
>> You truly are a vile little prick.
>>
>> Cuckolded? What year is this, 1900?
>>
>>
>> At 06:24 PM 4/8/2009, you wrote:
>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Weiss" <[log in to unmask]
>>> >
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 08, 2009 12:17 PM
>>> Subject: Re: Dead ends
>>>
>>>
>>> I think you misunderstand Creeley. He's precisely denying a division
>>>> between form and content. I'd suggest you also look at his poem
>>>> The Finger,
>>>> in his book Pieces. Or Numbers, in the same book.
>>>>
>>>> Mark
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well, if I misunderstand Creeley, worse luck for him. The guy did
>>> after
>>> all cuckold Kenneth Rexroth, who was a much greater figure.
>>>
>>
|