I haven't really been following this topic, but come on Joe, 1982 at
least.
Tim A.
On 7 Apr 2009, at 18:19, Jon Corelis wrote:
> My own reaction to that site was unenthusiastic not because it was
> experimental but because it wasn't: just looking it over I couldn't
> see a single idea that was later than 1972.
>
> As for the larger issue, of course my judgments on poetry have to be
> prescriptive, because I only like good poetry, so obviously if I like
> it it's good and if I don't it's not. I'm surprised I have to explain
> this.
>
> --
> ===============================================
>
> Jon Corelis http://jcorelis.googlepages.com/joncorelis
>
> ===============================================
|