.
The problem would hardly be in ethical standards or intellectual property
rights. Main obstacle would be that journal publishing is competitive, and
editors look for authors who can write something fresh, interesting and
evidence-based about topics that are hot today and might still be hot after 15
months, i.e. the earliest time when, after review, they could find a slot for a
good manuscript arriving today.
Normalisation [-zation] was hot in the 1970s, underwent critique and defence
in the 1980s, and was moving off the academic radar screen in the 1990s.
(Check the periodisation in Google Scholar...) You want to dig up those old
bones and give them a shake in a refereed journal in 2010 ?? bit
optimistic...
miles
On Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:03:41 +0100, Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
>Can anyone advise me of the existence of any open access disability
studies journals as there is a critique of normalisation, that I would very much
>wish to publish in a peer reviewed journal.
>The problem is that my ethical standards prevent me from publishing in any
>journal that is not open access, as that both compromises my intellectual
>property rights as an author and restricts public access to the document as
>well
>Larry
________________End of message________________
This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
Enquiries about list administration should be sent to [log in to unmask]
Archives and tools are located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.
|