Hi,
The problem was the profile test failing as suggested by Wladek and Lothar (thanks to both, for continuous teaching since grad school). I was using a profile fitting radius of 25 (not the default 10), so that's why I assumed profile fitting was not the problem. But now, I have played with the profile fitting radius (PFR), and below are the numbers.
PFR Compl% Compl% (high res bin)
25 81 63
50 96 80
60 98 86
And with hindsight, it was very embarrassing to find in my log file "count of observations deleted due to zero sigma or profile test", which tells me the problem. And again, because mosflm was giving me 100% complete datasets, it had to be a scalepack-specific implementation.
Interestingly, at a PFR of 50, a single profile covers almost a fourth of the image. Any input on that one?
Engin
----- Original Message -----
From: "Wladek Minor" <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask]
Sent: Saturday, April 11, 2009 5:11:40 PM GMT -08:00 US/Canada Pacific
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] HKL2000 and incompleteness
Try to increase profile fitting radius.
WM
------Original Message------
From: Ted Erickson
Sender: CCP4 bulletin board
To: [log in to unmask]
ReplyTo: Ted Erickson
Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] HKL2000 and incompleteness
Sent: Apr 11, 2009 7:56 PM
>So before I lose it because of HKL2000, I have two questions, and I'd
appreciate any answers to either:
>1. Can there be another reason for incompleteness that I am missing (other
than blind region at higher res., overlaps, overloads, and "not enough many
frames")?
Another explanation for incompleteness could be due to crystal packing that
results in an asymmetric diffraction pattern. The discrepancy between
HKL2000 and mosflm maybe a result of the resolution cutoff, however, this is
only a speculation.
Ted
www.P212121.com
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
|