JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for AI-SGES Archives


AI-SGES Archives

AI-SGES Archives


AI-SGES@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

AI-SGES Home

AI-SGES Home

AI-SGES  April 2009

AI-SGES April 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

2nd CFP AIED 2009 Workshop: Enabling creative learning design - how HCI, User Modelling and Human Factors help

From:

"George D. Magoulas" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

George D. Magoulas

Date:

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:52:08 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (208 lines)

CALL FOR PAPERS

“Enabling creative learning design: how HCI, User Modelling and Human
Factors help”
[https://sites.google.com/a/lkl.ac.uk/learning-design-workshop/Home]

A Workshop held in conjunction with the 14th International Conference on
Artificial Intelligence in Education
July 6th - 10th 2009, Thistle Hotel, Brighton, UK
http://www.aied2009.com


Background and Motivation
---------------------------------------
Although the term “Learning Design” (LD) has been in use only in recent
years, the earliest work in the field can be traced back to
“instructivist” approaches, which provided a clear instructional
sequence for teachers to follow. The recognition of the need to make
theoretical findings readily available to practitioners led to extensive
work on Instructional Design Theory, which attempted to make learning
theories more operational. However, the later focus on “constructivist”
theories of learning presented more of a challenge to an operational
approach. The development of interest in “Learning Design” as a focus of
research began with the realisation that the constructivist pedagogical
theories did not easily transfer to the practice of teaching. The
emphasis on what learners were doing, and how to support their
activities, was much less constrained by constructivism. This dependence
on the context in which learning takes place required an approach to
teaching based on design principles rather than pre-defined
instructional sequences.

There have been attempts to offer “toolkits” or software to enable ease
of entry into pedagogic design and support non-specialists in engaging
with learning theories. Despite the effort, existing e-learning systems
and authoring tools have several limitations in respect of support
provided and usability, and cannot accommodate the needs of teachers who
increasingly look for more intelligent services and support when
designing instruction in order to avoid disorientation and develop a
holistic understanding of how all the information fits together.
Providing support by incorporating personalisation technologies into
teachers’ designs could be potentially helpful in formulating teaching
goals and lesson plans and in better accommodating learners’ needs. In
fact, at present, systems do not provide tools for identifying patterns
in effective learning design practice and offer no opportunities for
teachers to personalise the learning experience and collaborate with
peers in developing more effective designs. It also appears to be a
large communication gap between authoring tools and learning systems,
and teachers/learning designers. For example, teachers want to work with
the terminology they are familiar with for describing their teaching and
learning, which of course can create a problem for the exchange of
learning designs using existing systems. Thus, the challenge for the
next generation of Learning Design tools is thus to put the designer
requirements and experiences at the centre of tool development. To this
end, the Workshop will draw to the vast experience of HCI and user
modeling and human factors research.

Learning design is a creative process and tools are prescriptive and
constraining and are often seen more as a hindrance. Thus, it is widely
acknowledged that we need to do more to bridge the education/computer
science divide and create a genuinely interdisciplinary basis for
representing learning design, if we are to succeed in persuading
teachers to work with this approach as the technical complexities
involved are often not perceived by teachers as relevant to their needs.
Moreover, it is important to offer teachers intelligent services, such
as personalisation and content adaptation, matching learners'
characteristics with specific learning designs, and exploiting
teachers-directed feedback about the usefulness and appropriateness of
learning objects or designs for certain learning scenarios. In this
vein, the Workshop considers personalisation in the context of learning
design as an important feature of the next generation of LD tools. This
could be achieved by capturing the needs of each individual teacher or
group of teachers and providing support for reaching a goal that
efficiently and knowledgeably addresses individual or group needs.
However, personalisation would not be achieved by prescribed sequences
of actions and information but by creating a dynamic structure, e.g.
based on ontologies, and more generally using user and community data so
that the Learning Design tools can adapt to the users’ knowledge,
profiles and needs, and that users can consciously adapt the system to
suit their articulated preferences. The Workshop will attempt to address
the challenges discussed above. Furthermore, it aims to explore what
teacher/learning designers-related information should be captured and
how, and what kind of adaptations are needed to support teachers’
individual needs, goals and interests. It will also look at how users'
interactions with designs and annotations of designs and the use of
concepts from controlled vocabularies, taxonomies and ontologies can be
captured in a user-friendly way and used to support the Learning Design
process.

The Workshop Content and Themes
-----------------------------------------------
Technology enhanced learning, to be fully effective, requires a
synthesis of insights from the learning sciences and Computer Science,
in particular AI. Broadly speaking, the learning sciences provide deep
insights into the learning design domain, while computing and
particularly AI-based approaches provide formal representations,
reasoning mechanisms and data structures that enable those insights to
be captured in a precise and computationally executable form. There is a
double challenge here, which is at the heart of a successful synthesis.

This half-day Workshop aims to bring together education, HCI and AI
experts to discuss and share ideas about the 21st century view on
learning design, curriculum and AI-based technology to support the
content design, creation, sharing, re-use, modification and learning
that may occur when teaching. Contributions will include theoretical and
applied research, and preliminary results on the following themes:

• Creative Interfaces for creative Learning Design: Needs of the user
and communities, barriers of use, usability and support through
intelligent interfaces. How can research in HCI and intelligent user
interfaces be used to facilitate the process of Learning Design? How can
interaction analysis be used to improve Learning Design?
• Human factor drivers for personalising the Learning Design experience:
Personalisation, re-use, sharing designs from theory to practice to
community. What are the human factors that influence the process of
Learning Design? What community concepts can be exploited to enable
creative Learning Design? What can AI do to capture and represent human
factor considerations, patterns of behaviour and community knowledge for
Learning Design? What AI-based knowledge representation and inference
mechanisms are needed in personalised Learning Design tools? Can these
AI-based mechanisms help to overcome the cognitive demands when using
these tools?

Workshop Topics
---------------------------
Full and short papers that address one or more of the following topics
are welcome

• User experiences when designing a course using existing tools and
identification of their limitations;
• Context-aware design to support Learning Design;
• Context-awareness as a design approach to aid building e-learning
design tools; Can next generation AI reduce cognitive overload to
enhance the usability?
• User-centred design models for Learning Designs (user models,
preferences, usage models, personalisation);
• Human factors experience from the “Learner Designer perspective”, e.g.
users approach to design, users tool preferences, priorities, re-use of
designs;
• HCI design to overcome barriers of use;
• Recommendation systems and personalisation for Learning Design:
designing rule of thumb or heuristics, inference on ontological models,
inference theory and architecture, nearest neighbour for “concept”
recommendation; Can they help with tool usage? How can pedagogical
approaches be used in Learning Design to personalise the learning
experience?
• Drawing from research and experience from other applications to see
how Education tools might benefit from AI.
• Community-based and collaborative approaches. Does a community or
collaborative approach ease the learning design task?
• Intelligent interfaces to aid the creative process of Learning Design;
• User modelling to assist Learning Design tools to enhance
personalisation features.

Submission Format and Procedure
--------------------------------------------
Full papers should not exceed 10 pages and short papers should be up to
5 pages. Authors should follow the same template that is used for the
main conference. All papers should be formatted according to IOS Press
guidelines (formatting instructions are available on the IOS Press
Authors Corner webpages at: www.iospress.nl/). Workshop papers will be
published in full length in the workshop proceedings and presented
orally at the Workshop. The papers will be printed locally for
dissemination at the AIED Workshops and kept as a PDF file resource on
the website. Please, submit your paper by e-mail to both Patricia
Charlton ([log in to unmask]) and Kyparisia Papanikolaou
([log in to unmask]) by April 16, 2009. Portable Document Format (*.pdf) is
preferred.

Important Dates
-------------------------
April 16, 2009: submission of papers
May 20, 2009: notification of results
End of May 2009: delivery of camera-ready paper

Workshop Programme Committee
------------------------------------------------
Liliana Ardissono, University of Torino, Italy
Stefano Cerri, University of Montpellier II, France
Patricia Charlton, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK
Brock Craft, Institute of Education, UK
Ines Di Loreto, Dept of Informatics and Communication, University of
Milan, Italy
Maria Grigoriadou, University of Athens, Greece
Jelena Jovanovic, University of Belgrade, Serbia
Diana Laurillard, Institute of Education, UK
George Magoulas, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK
Alvaro Ortigosa, Universidad Autónonoma de Madrid. Spain
Kyparisia Papanikolaou, School of Pedagogical and Technological
Education, Athens, Greece
Barbara Schmidt-Belz, Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information
Technology, Germany
Martin Wolpers, Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik
FIT,Germany

Workshop Organisation
----------------------------------
Patricia Charlton, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK
Maria Grigoriadou, University of Athens, Greece
Diana Laurillard, Institute of Education, UK
George Magoulas, Birkbeck College, University of London, UK
Kyparisia Papanikolaou, School of Pedagogical and Technological
Education, Athens, Greece

Contact Person
---------------------
For any questions regarding the Workshop, please email George Magoulas
([log in to unmask]).

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager