Thanks for your reply.
Does this mean that the fMRI data are only affinely registered between
John Ashburner wrote:
> If you have SPM8b (latest updates), then you should find this much easier, as
> there is now an option to spatially normalise (and spatially blur) fMRI to
> MNI space (as it incorporates an additional affine mapping between DARTEL
> template and MNI template). I haven't had a chance to update the user guide
> for DARTEL yet, but it should be reasonably straightforward to use.
> I expect that the t stats should be increased, and look forward to any
> feedback on whether this is the case.
> Best regards,
> On Tuesday 24 March 2009 16:22, Amir Tahmasebi wrote:
>> Dear John and SPMers,
>> I am trying to use DARTEL for normalization of fMRI data. I have looked at
>> "how to use DARTEL for normalizing fMRI con maps?" thread but it is not
>> exactly what I was looking for.
>> I was wondering how should I use the outputs of DARTEL ("u_rc1*.nii" and
>> "Template_6.nii") to normalize my fMRI data which is already coregistered
>> to the corresponding structural data.
>> Thank you,
Amir M. Tahmasebi
Medical Image Analysis Lab.
School of Computing,
Tel: (613) 533-2797