The Disability-Research Discussion List

Managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds

Help for DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Archives


DISABILITY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH Home

DISABILITY-RESEARCH  March 2009

DISABILITY-RESEARCH March 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Terminology: disabled students v students with disabilities?

From:

Bronagh Byrne <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Bronagh Byrne <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 12:45:16 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (257 lines)

 

Hi All,

 

We have had this discussion in Northern Ireland also and came up with a
short statement as to why we chose to use 'people with disabilities'
rather than disabled people as part of our name 'The Centre on Human
Rights for People with Disabilities'. I have copied this below - 

 

The Centre on Human Rights for People with Disabilities 

 

The Centre on Human Rights is acutely aware of ongoing debate, both in
and outside of the disability movement, concerning the use of
appropriate terminology to describe people who have impairments and who
are disabled by society. As part of an organisation working with and for
people with disabilities, the Centre on Human Rights has carefully
considered the implications of adopting particular terminology. 

 

The Centre on Human Rights respects the choices that people make in
choosing how to best describe their identity and experiences. We
recognise that some people prefer to use the term 'people with
disabilities' while others prefer to use the term 'disabled people'. 

 

We understand that the use of 'people with disabilities' in the Centre
name will be contentious to some. The decision to use this terminology
has been informed by people with disabilities throughout Northern
Ireland. People with disabilities have told us that, placing the noun
'people' before 'disabilities' emphasises the fact that individuals who
are disabled by society are in fact people first - something which
historically has been denied. 

 

The Centre on Human Rights understands the terms 'disability' and
'disabilities' to mean the range of oppressive practices and barriers by
which an individual with impairment is disabled by our society. This
includes attitudinal, physical, environmental, social and economic
barriers and encompasses institutional and systemic forms of
discrimination. 

 

The decision to use the term 'people with disabilities' has also been
shaped by the international context in which the Centre carries out its
work. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of Persons with
Disabilities (2006) does not explicitly define the term disability, but
states that "Persons with disabilities include those who have long-term
physical, mental, intellectual or sensory impairments which, in
interaction with various barriers, may hinder their full and effective
participation in society on an equal basis with others" (Article 1). The
consistent use of 'people with disabilities' is, in the Centre's view,
vital in promoting the standardisation of international disability
terminology and its harmonization with the principles of human rights. 

 

In addition, the General Assembly of the United Nations has recently
renamed the 'International Day of Disabled Persons' on 03 December each
year as the 'International Day of Persons with Disabilities' to reflect
developments on the international stage. The term 'people with
disabilities' is also widely used and preferred by organisations of and
for people with disabilities across the world, not least by many of
those individuals and organisations who were involved in negotiating the
terms and conditions of the Convention. 

 

In choosing to use the term 'people with disabilities', the Centre on
Human Rights does not exclude those who prefer the term 'disabled
people', but believes that 'people with disabilities' is most
appropriate for the Centre in delivering its mission to protect, promote
and ensure the human rights of all those who experience the disabling
effects of our society. 

 

For further information, please contact the Centre on Human Rights for
People with Disabilities, 189 Airport Road West, Belfast, Northern
Ireland, BT3 9ED UK or email [log in to unmask]

 

 

Dr Bronagh Byrne

Research and Policy Officer

The Centre on Human Rights for People with Disabilities

Disability Action

Portside Business Park

189 Airport Road West

Belfast

BT3 9ED

Northern Ireland

United Kingdom

 

Tel: 0044 (0)28 90 297880

Fax: 0044 (0)28 90 297881

Mobile: 07501500062

Textphone: 00 44 (0)28 90 297878

Typetalk (Telephone to Textphone): 18002 02890 297878

 

Email: [log in to unmask]

Website: www.disabilityaction.org

Register for Disability Action's Monthly E-zine visit
www.disabilityaction.org/register.aspx

 

-----Original Message-----
From: The Disability-Research Discussion List
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jenny W
Sent: 10 March 2009 12:27
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Terminology: disabled students v students with
disabilities?

 

 Larry,

 

what do you mean by "impairment termed in whatever way should never be a
negative judgement"?

 

 

--- On Tue, 10/3/09, Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

From: Larry Arnold <[log in to unmask]>

Subject: Re: Terminology: disabled students v students with
disabilities?

To: [log in to unmask]

Date: Tuesday, 10 March, 2009, 9:02 AM

 

The usage of the term is not insignificant as the usage person with

disabilities is clumsy and in its attempt to separate the impairment
from

the person implies that the impairment (which termed disability in

thatcontext, creates a barrier to looking at disability in a social and

reletavist context) is something nasty, taboo, one does not and should
not

be associated with.

 

Well I will paraphrase Haile Sellasie through his erstwhile interpreter
Bob

Marley, until the impairment is of no more significance than the colour
of

the eyes, then everywhere is war.

 

Impairment termed in whatever way should never be a negative judgement
and

that is precisely what person first language does even if it intends the

opposite.

 

In my opinion it gets well in the way of adopting a positive identity
and in

effect accepts a status quo of oppression and second class citizenship

 

Larry

 

 

 

 

      

 

________________End of message________________

 

This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for
Disability Studies at the University of Leeds
(www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).

Enquiries about list administration should be sent to
[log in to unmask]

 

Archives and tools are located at:

www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html

You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web
page.


________________End of message________________

This Disability-Research Discussion list is managed by the Centre for Disability Studies at the University of Leeds (www.leeds.ac.uk/disability-studies).
Enquiries about list administration should be sent to [log in to unmask]

Archives and tools are located at:
www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/disability-research.html
You can VIEW, POST, JOIN and LEAVE the list by logging in to this web page.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager