On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:07:26 +0000, Richard Light
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>In message <[log in to unmask]>, Rick
>Lawrence <[log in to unmask]> writes
>>
>>Noting what you say about CMS driven systems we did consider using the
>>Wordpress system. We decided not to for two reasons. One was the time it
>>would take to create and administer compared to Facebook, and the other
>>was it could be seen as building an alternative web site to our existing
council
>>provided one.
>
>You don't necessarily have to adopt a separate system to achieve this
>functionality. We have developed a mechanism whereby UGC is stored in a
>ModesXML data file, linked (in this case) to an object record; I'm sure
>it's possible to do similar things with other collections database
>products.
>
>Richard Light
>--
>Richard Light
>
>**************************************************
>For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the list, visit the
website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
>**************************************************
Hi Richard
I think I may have mislead you there.
By CMS I mean content management system, not collections management
system.
Can you tell I have only been working the museum sector since last June ;)
Have a good weekend all.
Rick Lawrence
Digital Media Officer
RAMM
**************************************************
For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the list, visit the website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
**************************************************
|