JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN Archives

PHD-DESIGN Archives


PHD-DESIGN@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN Home

PHD-DESIGN  January 2009

PHD-DESIGN January 2009

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Design Policy Reflections

From:

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Ken Friedman <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:57:08 +1100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (42 lines)

Friends,

Klaus's response and Dori's on the design policy thread deserve a few quick thoughts.

Klaus was right to read some skepticism between the lines of my note. I do want to make clear what it was that I was questioning. I'm not questioning the design policy proposal or even the idea of design policy. Rather, I'm skeptical to the idea of demanding that any policy should do too much.

As the author of a great policy document on NSF funding for design research, Klaus and his colleagues hit just the right note. It's a profoundly pragmatic document intended to get appropriate government action under way -- while avoiding what cannot or ought not to be done in such a framework. Unfortunately, not all the proposals have yet been adopted -- well, there's a lot that has not happened over the past 8 years -- but the document is worth reading. Perhaps things will change, albeit slowly ... it's tough to do as much today given the massive level of debt and deficit. Looks like Alan Greenspan was wrong on giving back the Clinton-Gore current-account surplus following the election, but that is another story. Nevertheless, that story and all political stories like it affect what can be done, and that, too, tempers what the authors of the design policy proposal could reasonably have hoped to achieve.

My hat is off to Dori Tunstall and her colleagues in this venture. She is among the people whose work means a great deal to me.

Whenever someone pioneers a new vision, there will be difficulties. The responses and challenges to the proposal include challenges that arise from misunderstanding, challenges that arise from the insistence that this still-new venture respond to the old agenda items that carry forward from the past, and challenges that represent valuable ideas that simply are outside the scope of a policy proposal. Reading the blogs and debates, though, I observe that several challenges seem to arise just because someone is plain old grumpy -- they don't like Dori's language or the fact that she has a PhD or whatever. (Some people seem to oppose the document because they think that Dori is not a practicing designer. They're wrong, of course, but they have an opinion, and there is no law against holding an ill-informed opinion. Sic transit gloria blogosphere.)


As I see it, the design policy proposal that this group has developed is a valuable and inspiring document. The fact that it doesn't please everyone is a minor and inevitable condition of life on earth. This is a proposal, not a finished policy, and now it enters the realm of public reflection and debate.

Klaus caught an important added note of skepticism between the lines of my post. I am genuinely curious about design policy as an object of inquiry. How well have design policies fulfilled the goals set for them? What have different nations achieved? How have the achievements related to the degree to which these nations or their agencies actually implemented or failed to implement design policy proposals? Have design support or design promotion measures been useful, as contrasted -- for example -- with measures that emphasize "ice-breaker" plans to bring designers together with clients? Have policies that emphasize education and research been effective.

There has been little serious research on these kinds of questions, and I'd like to know more. Until we do, I am both interested in design policy and skeptical in a reasoned sort of way. As author or co-author of four policy proposals, I retain both my interest and my skepticism.

The design policy group shows the virtues of making and thinking. This is how the world moves forward. This is a pragmatic proposal in the best sense of the word, the Deweyan sense. It is a great American tradition and this is a good time to witness the renewal of robust American virtues with an emphasis on good government, democratic debate, and the genuine economic renewal of industry rather than speculative excess with payoffs for those who bankrupt companies and layoffs for those who work.

The authors of the policy proposal -- and let's not forget the word proposal -- have not pushed a new law through by executive order. They have performed a public service on short time and little money, addressing issues that concern us all.

One way to further the debate is not to complain about what's wrong with the measures in this proposal, but to add what might be missing in actionable terms. That said, I will claim the right as researcher and author of design policy proposals to suggest that this one looks good to me.

Warm wishes on this splendid new day.

Ken



Ken Friedman, PhD, DSc (hc), FDRS
Professor
Dean

Swinburne Design
Swinburne University of Technology
Melbourne, Australia

Telephone +61 3 9214 6755 
www.swinburne.edu.au/design

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager