JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH  December 2008

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH December 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Normal birth guideline/pathway

From:

"Hunter, Billie" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research." <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Sun, 7 Dec 2008 13:37:27 -0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (154 lines)

Hello Carolyn 

Wales has been using the All Wales Clinical Pathway for Normal Labour
since 2004. It is partly a record of care and partly a set of guidelines
for practice, used for the intrapartum care of all women considered to
be low risk. I've recently conducted an ethnographic study of this
pathway, looking at how it was created and implemented, how it used 'on
the ground' by midwives, and how it has been experienced by midwives,
mothers, managers and doctors.  The final project report is available at
http://www.swan.ac.uk/media/Media,20124,en.pdf (or I can send you a copy
in the post if you are interested). 

The findings suggest that the implementation of the pathway has had a
number of unanticipated outcomes for the working practices of midwives,
midwife-doctor relationships and the experiences of women. Although
midwives generally felt that their confidence has been boosted, there
were many reservations expressed about the possible long term impact on
the development of clinical reasoning and clinical judgement (similar to
the concerns raised by  Soo Downe). As a record of care, the pathway
uses the approach of 'documentation by exception'. Many midwives were
concerned about the implications of this 'tick box approach'. The lack
of a written story was considered to have implications for reflection on
the birth by the woman and /or midwife, and also menatthat evidnec was
lacking in complaints or litigation cases.

There is an interesting body of sociological literure about the use of
guidelines and protocols, which suggests that decision making tools are
far from being neutral devices. For example:

Berg, M., 1997. Problems and promises of the protocol. Social Science
and
Medicine 44 (8), 1081-1088.

Berg, M., Horstman, K., Plass, S., van Heusden, M., 2000. Guidelines,
professionals and the production of objectivity: standardisation and the
professionalism of insurance medicine. Sociology of Health and Illness
22
(6), 765-791.

Hunter B., Segrott J (2007) Re-mapping client journeys and professional
identities: A review of the literature on clinical pathways.
International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45 (2008) 608-625


Best wishes
Billie Hunter

Billie Hunter
Professor of Midwifery 
Institute for Health Research 
School of Health Science 
Floor 2 Vivian Tower 
Swansea University 
Swansea SA2 8PP 

Tel: +44(0)1792 518584
Fax: +44(0)1792 295127




-----Original Message-----
From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health
research. [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Denis
Walsh
Sent: 05 December 2008 08:45
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Normal birth guideline/pathway

Hi Carolyn,
The best one I have seen is the draft that the Keeping Birth Normal &
Dynamic programme in Scotland has come up with. It covers antenatal,
intrapartum and postnatal but the intrapartum one in particular is
excellent in getting a balance between evidence and midwifery discretion
in decision-making. This web site has the info, though the final
document is not available yet. I was a reviewer for the draft.
http://www.nhshealthquality.org/nhsqis/4517.140.1123.html
Best wishes,
Denis
Dr Denis Walsh
Reader in Normal Birth
University of Central Lancashire
Independent Midwifery Consultant
Home Address:
366 Hinckley Rd
Leicester LE3 0TN
Tel: 0116 2166255
Mob: 07905735777


-----Original Message-----
From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health
research.
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Jane Sandall
Sent: 04 December 2008 08:29
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Fw: Normal birth guideline/pathway

Replies to list please
bw
Jane Sandall
----- Original Message -----
From: "Carolyn Hastie" <[log in to unmask]>
To: <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, December 03, 2008 6:24 AM
Subject: Normal birth guideline/pathway


Hello everyone,

I'm wondering if anyone has a guideline around the care of women during 
normal birth.  Suggestions around when VE's are indicated etc.

We don't have such a thing, we have guidelines around prolonged labour, 
prolonged pregnancy etc. We rely on the midwives assessment of when
labour 
is no longer normal, understanding that there is a huge variation in
women 
and their process.

Someone from another area asked me if we had one as they have to put
such 
guidelines in place following an incident.

I thought I would ask the collected wisdom here on this list what they
have 
in their places of practice.

I look forward to hearing from you.

with best wishes, Carolyn (Can you believe it is nearly a New Year?)

Carolyn Hastie
Midwifery Manager
Belmont Birthing Services
Hunter New England Health

Conjoint Senior Lecturer
School of Nursing & Midwifery
University of Newcastle

FACMI  IBCLC

Mobile 0428 112 786
Email     [log in to unmask]

Midwife-led versus other models of care for
childbearing women-Latest Cochrane Review

 Author's conclusions
All women should be offered midwifery-led models of care and women
should be
encouraged to ask for this option.

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager