JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-LINK Archives


LIS-LINK Archives

LIS-LINK Archives


LIS-LINK@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-LINK Home

LIS-LINK Home

LIS-LINK  November 2008

LIS-LINK November 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

FW: SED and digital editions

From:

Nicola Tricker <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Nicola Tricker <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 11 Nov 2008 16:00:47 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (55 lines)

-----Original Message-----
From: Graham Titley
Sent: 11 November 2008 15:47
To: Nicola Tricker
Subject: RE: SED and digital editions

Much of the discussion, help and information on this topic is shared on LIS-ILL, the list for interlibrary loans and document delivery staff.

Following a recent meeting, the position in regard to Adobe Acrobat Reader & Adobe Digital Editions is as follows:
Providing you use Adobe Digital Editions to run de-encryption/authentication of documents it does not matter what version of Adobe Acrobat Reader you have installed.
Adobe are migrating the document encryption level support for Reader & Digital Editions from Adobe Content Server 3 to 4.  Content Server 4 is not backwardly compatible and so will not be able to support document authentication utilising Reader version 6 or 7, only versions 8 or better.  These later versions require Adobe Digital Editions to perform the document authentication and handle the document de-encryption process.  Therefore, from March 2009 no new user profiles will be allowed to be created on the Adobe authentication website through Reader 6 or 7.  Content Server 3 and 4 are now being operated concurrently, with authentication support for Reader versions 6 & 7 being completely withdrawn in September 2009 when Content Server 4 will become the only operational standard.
The basic suggestion is that all users should be encouraged to start using Adobe Digital Editions (ADE) now in order to minimise the impact of the change to the new Server standard.  The problem is that Adobe have still not provided a version of Digital Editions that IT departments can package and roll out centrally as part of a 'cold' computer profile.  This means that ADE is an on demand install - done once (except for being forced to run upgrades!) by users using their own computers or staff/researchers with a static profile on their office computers, whilst for Open Access users with a roving profile the program has to be installed every time you log-in and want to run an SED.  Despite over 12 months of constant pressure from ourselves (and other UK & US institutions) the closest we have come to any resolution for this issue is the promise recently made to The British Library - a version of ADE which will be capable of central installation will be released in April 2009 (mentioned in the SED FAQs (number 10) 21st Oct 2008 & reaffirmed in a BL meeting on 6th November).  BL insist that the promise was a commitment and that the file will be released and available - me, I'm a little more sceptical and will wait and see (for instance, posted on the ADE User Forum on October 30th, ADE staff did not acknowledge to an American user that the product is even timetabled for April when asked the question about when a version for central install would be released, simply stating that they are aware of a number of requests and that it will be considered for a future release  - doesn't exactly instill confidence!).
Yes, there are problems with ADE - it's not recognised by IE7/Mozilla/Firefox as an e-book reader; limited device authentications (tell your users not to authorise computers; if you reach 6 authenticated devices then you are blocked and your profile can only be reset by Adobe Technical Support); open access users losing access if they log-off before printing; not being able to print or only printing odd pages; poor document batching over networks to printers without (or with only a small amount of) local memory etc etc.  But this is the process available so we have to use it.  Staff and users will and do learn how to use it and it can deliver documents faster than snail mail and directly to the user wherever they may be using email.  We provide over 90% of copy requests via SED - practically all downloaded by users.  However, roll on the day when BL can offer a non-encrypted e-document delivery service!

Graham Titley
Document Delivery and Copyright Librarian
University of Plymouth
Drake Circus
Plymouth
PL4 8AA

Tel: 01752 587162 or 587161
Email: [log in to unmask]

_______________________________________
From: A general Library and Information Science list for news and discussion. [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Arthur, Jane [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 11 November 2008 11:20
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: SED and digital editions

This is a rather specific query, but as I am not aware of a discussion list/forum for users of the BL SED service, I thought I would try the lis-link and see what happens..

We use the BL SED service and get  journal article requests delivered directly to our users. This works fine, by and large, for our staff, who have their own dedicated workstations, and also for students accessing these at home or via own laptops. However, we have a real problem with our workstations in LRCs, where students log in with a 'roaming profile' , because BL will be requiring all users of SEDs to use Adobe digital editions (instead of Adobe 7).


"From early 2009, the Digital Rights Management (DRM) software that provides the encryption for your SED documents will no longer be supported. From that time, Adobe Digital Editions will be required to receive SED documents. "

Our technical support has contacted an HE technical forum and received messages agreeing that this is a real problem (Bangor, Dundee, Napier, Lincoln and others), but I am just wondering why I have heard nothing from the libraries front. Is this an issue for colleagues, and if so, how are you handling it?

Pls pass this on to relevant colleagues - and apologies if this is of no interest to you! Thanks, Jane


Jane Arthur
Assistant Director
Learning & Information Services
University of Hertfordshire
College Lane
Hatfield
Herts
AL10 9AB

e: [log in to unmask]
t: 01707 285770
f: 01707 285768

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager