JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM  November 2008

CRISIS-FORUM November 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

[Fwd: [Nocarbontrade-l] Times of London: EUETS "making a mockery" of Europe's attempt to lead on climate]

From:

CHRIS KEENE <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

CHRIS KEENE <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 6 Nov 2008 10:32:22 +0000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (135 lines)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[Nocarbontrade-l] Times of London: EUETS "making a mockery" of 
Europe's attempt to lead on climate
Date: 	Wed, 5 Nov 2008 18:02:33 -0000 (UTC)
From: 	[log in to unmask]
To: 	[log in to unmask]



"The [EU Emissions Trading Scheme] is making a mockery of Europe’s
stumbling attempts to lead the world in a market-based carbon strategy.

". . . there is a wider question about the ETS that must be addressed and
that is whether it is a sensible mechanism to regulate carbon.

". . . Violent movements in price cause financial damage and promote
short-termism, the sort of thinking that is anathema to the climate change
lobby.

"If there is to be any prospect of a serious cut in carbon, there must be
stability in carbon pricing. Although a financial market gives useful
price signals, it cannot provide stability.

"Only a stable regulatory regime can provide certainty . . ."





Policy leap vital for any serious cut in carbon emissions
Carl Mortished
World Business Briefing
Times of London

While you were distracted by crashing banks and clashing senators, you may
have missed a small environmental earthquake. The price of carbon has
collapsed.

In only three months, life has become a lot cheaper for polluters; the
financial cost of warming the planet has plummeted in Europe’s emissions
trading system (ETS) and the effectiveness of such a volatile market
mechanism in curbing carbon is being questioned.

You may recall that the ETS is a mechanism to encourage businesses to
reduce their carbon output. Europe’s larger companies are allocated
permits to emit CO2 , and these allowances, called EUAs, can be traded on
exchanges. Companies that emit less CO2 than their allocation can sell
EUAs for cash, but inefficient polluters must buy EUAs or face bigger
financial penalties.

The idea is that a shortfall in EUAs allocated by government will cause
the carbon price to rise, stimulating investment in carbon reduction. It’s
a market solution to pollution, but this carbon market is showing a
distressing tendency to behave like most financial markets - hysterically.
In July, the right to spew out one tonne of CO2 from a chimney would have
cost a power generator €29.33, but yesterday it could be bought for only
€18.25.

The sudden collapse of the carbon price mirrors the rout in the wider
commodity markets. Carbon peaked in July, its price summit occurring
within ten days of the peak in the crude oil price. Since then, everything
from steel to potash has been tumbling and you might think it unsurprising
that carbon has tracked the general retreat. Hedge funds and other
financial investors dabbled in EUAs, as they fiddled with palm oil and
soya. The rush to convert hedge fund investments into cash and US Treasury
bills has resulted in rapid closure of positions on various carbon
exchanges.

Obviously, the credit crunch has little to do with underlying demand for
EUAs in a market artificially created by regulators in Brussels. However,
economic downturn and recession will have an impact on the carbon market.
Less industrial and transport activity implies fewer emissions, and so the
shortfall between actual emissions and allowances will shrink, reducing
demand for EUAs, thereby causing the carbon price to fall.

Some analysts reckon that the carbon price has fallen far enough, even
allowing for a recession.

IDEAcarbon, a rating agency, has halved its estimate of the allocation
shortfall from 206 million tonnes of carbon to 98 million tonnes in 2008
and 83 million tonnes in 2009. The point is that there will still be a
shortfall. Société Générale reckons that EUAs will find a floor at €15 per
tonne before rebounding next year into the low €20s per tonne.

Maybe so, but the ETS is making a mockery of Europe’s stumbling attempts
to lead the world in a market-based carbon strategy. It is causing
irritation and frustration to the armies of advisers and investors who
seek to cajole utilities into big investments in carbon reduction. James
Cameron, the director of Climate Change Capital, a financial adviser and
fund manager, said: “The whole purpose [of the ETS] is to take carbon out.
It’s not there to benefit funds or to support trading.”

It’s those “speculators” again, the ones that pushed the oil price up the
hill to $147 a barrel and then let it roll back to $60. It is a terrible
irony that one aim of creating a carbon market was to provide a measure of
certainty to the energy industry in estimating the future price of carbon
for the purpose of planning investments in new power generators. Estimates
of the carbon price at which carbon capture and storage technology might
be economically viable vary between €40 and €60 per tonne. Suffice it to
say we are nowhere near these levels.

More political action is needed, Mr Cameron says, with smaller carbon
allocations by governments to industry, which would entail a much bigger
shortfall in EUAs and a much higher carbon price. It is a moot point,
however, whether there is political appetite in Europe for such a burden.
The European Commission is already struggling to create a coalition of the
willing to do battle with carbon emissions, and Silvio Berlusconi, the
Italian Prime Minister, has made clear his preference for a gentle regime.

It’s a measure of the speed at which politics moves in response to market
prices that the green agenda has almost vanished from media political
chatter. Carbon’s falling price spells companies going bust, the loss of
jobs and the shredding of political reputations. Over the next year, no
politician with reelection hopes will back a policy that would triple the
price of carbon for industry and raise consumers’ energy costs. But there
is a wider question about the ETS that must be addressed and that is
whether it is a sensible mechanism to regulate carbon.

Price volatility, whether in oil, gas or coal, is a huge burden for the
energy industry. Violent movements in price cause financial damage and
promote short-termism, the sort of thinking that is anathema to the
climate change lobby.

If there is to be any prospect of a serious cut in carbon, there must be
stability in carbon pricing. Although a financial market gives useful
price signals, it cannot provide stability.

Only a stable regulatory regime can provide certainty, but that means
carbon taxes and a policy leap that no one is yet willing to make.

_______________________________________________
Nocarbontrade-l mailing list
[log in to unmask]
http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/nocarbontrade-l

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

September 2022
May 2018
January 2018
September 2016
May 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
September 2015
August 2015
May 2015
March 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
July 2004


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager