JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Archives


CRISIS-FORUM@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM Home

CRISIS-FORUM  October 2008

CRISIS-FORUM October 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

[Fwd: [kyoto2-discussion] Guardian blog article on GDRs; China Grim on Prospects for Climate Pact]

From:

CHRIS KEENE <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

CHRIS KEENE <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 7 Oct 2008 03:56:34 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (313 lines)

-------- Original Message --------
Subject: 	[kyoto2-discussion] Guardian blog article on GDRs; China Grim 
on Prospects for Climate Pact
Date: 	Mon, 6 Oct 2008 22:19:35 +0000
From: 	Jim Roland <[log in to unmask]>
Reply-To: 	[log in to unmask]
To: 	<[log in to unmask]>, <[log in to unmask]>, 
<[log in to unmask]>, Mayer Hillman <[log in to unmask]>, CCC 
London <[log in to unmask]>



1.  Only 3 comments at time of sending!
 
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2008/oct/06/climatechange.carbonemissions 
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2008/oct/06/climatechange.carbonemissions>
 


  A brave new target: cut greenhouse emissions by 122%


    A new approach to tackling climate change advocates setting emission
    reduction targets - of sometimes greater than 100% - according a
    country's responsibility and capacity to contribute to a solution.
    Could this ever be put into practice, asks Duncan Clark

All comments (3) 
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2008/oct/06/climatechange.carbonemissions?commentpage=1> 


    * *Duncan Clark* <http://www.guardian.co.uk/profile/duncanclark>
    * guardian.co.uk <http://www.guardian.co.uk/>,
    * Monday October 06 2008 15:30 BST
    * Article history

Over the past 10 years, targets for cuts in CO2 emissions have crept up. 
Take the UK. Kyoto required a 12.5% reduction from 1990 levels by 2012, 
some of which we'd already achieved when we ratified the agreement. 
Next, the government promised a 20% reduction by the same date. That 
developed into a 60% cut by 2050, which the government has now accepted 
may need to become an 80% reduction.
George Monbiot and others have gone further 
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2007/dec/04/comment.politics>, 
calling for a cut of more than 90% by 2050 to reflect the latest science 
and to allow for equal distribution of the right to pollute around the 
world.
Many think that targets such as these sound hopelessly ambitious, but a 
new report 
<http://www.sei.se/editable/pages/news/Sweden%20GDRs%20Final.pdf> (pdf) 
from the Stockholm Environment Institute <http://www.sei.se/index.php> 
goes further still. It claims that for many developed countries a useful 
and just target will be a reduction of more than 100%  and in just over 
a decade. The report takes Sweden as a case study and concludes that its 
goal should be a drop in emissions of 122% by 2020.
Hold on a minute, I hear you cry, how can a country reduce its emissions 
by more than it produces?
The answer to that seeming paradox, of course, is to pay for emissions 
reductions abroad. But why should Sweden and other similar countries 
have to do that? Surely reducing its own emissions to zero  or nearly 
zero  would be enough?
Not according to the new report, which is based on an approach called 
Greenhouse Development Rights <http://www.ecoequity.org/GDRs/>. This 
idea has been around a year or so, but hasn't often made the headlines. 
The new report is an interesting example of seeing how it might actually 
work in practice. It's all a bit complex, so bear with me here.
The approach is based on the idea that the developing world will, 
justifiably, never "prioritise rapid emissions reductions above its goal 
of human development for its people. Any strategy that even implicitly 
attempts to force such a prioritisation will be futile."
The way around this potential roadblock, the report suggests, is to work 
out the true responsibility of each country  ie its emissions  as well 
as its true capacity to contribute to the solution.
To work out the responsibility, you look at imports and exports to work 
out the true carbon footprint of each country. If an individual in the 
West purchases something  be it a phone made in China or a bean grown 
in Kenya  the emissions are allocated to your country, not the country 
that produced it. In the case of Sweden  which, like most rich 
countries, imports far more than it exports  this adds around a fifth 
to its official emissions figures.
How about capacity? The idea here is to set an income threshold  the 
report plumps for $20 per person per day  above which a responsibility 
for paying for climate change kicks in. It's a bit like how income tax 
works: you don't pay anything until you earn a fixed annual minimum.
Finally, you work out the total required cut in global emissions 
reductions and divvy it up nation-by-nation according to responsibility 
and capacity. In the case of Sweden, the report calculates that it 
should make (or pay for) 0.51% of the world's total emissions savings, 
which equates to 122% of its current emissions. This ambitious target, 
the report estimates, would cost the average Swedish citizen around 
$1.20 per day.
For comparison, the US would need to make or pay for 33% of the world's 
emissions saving, the EU 26%, Japan 7.8%, China 5.5% and India 0.5%. But 
over time, as emissions and income patterns shift, so do the targets. If 
a country gets greener, its responsibility drops. If it gets richer, it 
will be asked to do more.
All of which is rather neat. I'm going to ponder this idea more (the 
report doesn't make for easy Monday-morning reading), but my initial 
reaction to the GDR concept is positive  something worth serious 
consideration alongside competing schemes such as Contraction & 
Convergence <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contraction_and_Convergence> 
and Kyoto2 
<http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2008/jul/01/climatechange.carbonemissions>.
Unfortunately, as with all such schemes, it's hard to imagine today's 
world signing up. Sweden? Perhaps. The US? Perhaps not. The American 
politicians who have recently been describing the financial bail-out as 
the first step on the slippery path to socialism would doubtless make 
parallels between the GDR approach and that old Marxist maxim: from each 
according to his ability, to each according to his need.
The report acknowledges that its proposal would be hard for many nations 
to swallow, with targets "large enough to seem implausible by today's 
standards of political realism." But it implores Sweden to take a do the 
right thing by the climate and the world's poor by committing to its 
122% carbon cut in the run-up to the Copenhagen summit.
We'll have to wait and see if it happens. It seems a long shot to me, 
but we can take some comfort from the fact that a handful of Western 
governments  such as Sweden's  may at least seriously consider such 
targets. Thanks be for Scandinavia.
 
 
2.  http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/50493/story.htm 
<http://www.planetark.com/dailynewsstory.cfm/newsid/50493/story.htm>
 
*China Grim on Prospects for Climate Pact *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
_Mail this story to a friend_ 
<http://www.planetark.com/mail_dailynewsstory.cfm?newsid=50493> | 
_Printer friendly version_ 
<http://www.planetark.com/avantgo/dailynewsstory.cfm?newsid=50493>


CHINA: October 7, 2008

*BEIJING - Negotiations seeking a global pact to tackle global warming 
are troubled and could end in disastrous failure, China's top climate 
change envoy warned on Monday, saying rich countries are failing to 
deliver on promises. *

China is emerging as the world's top emitter of the greenhouse gases 
that stoke dangerous global warming and plays a key role in talks to 
address the threat. These are supposed to culminate in a new deal in 
Copenhagen, Denmark, late next year. But Yu Qingtai, China's special 
representative for climate change talks, told Reuters he was gloomy 
about the discussions to create a treaty building on commitments laid 
out in the Kyoto Protocol's first phase, which expires at the end of 2012.

"As far as the Copenhagen process is concerned, my personal assessment 
is unfortunately fairly pessimistic...things have moved forward in an 
extremely difficult way and the progress achieved is extremely limited," 
Yu said in an interview.

In preliminary talks, rich nations had failed to flesh out their 
promises to give technology and financing help to poorer countries, he 
said.

The global financial turmoil draining government budgets should not be 
"used as an excuse by the developed country governments for not meeting 
their commitments", he added.

China's rising greenhouse gas emissions, which experts believe have 
already or will soon surpass those of the United States, have prompted 
many Western politicians and experts to argue that Beijing must accept 
mandatory caps if the United States and other reluctant countries are to 
agree to emissions cuts.

Under current agreements, China and other developing countries need not 
take on greenhouse gas caps under Kyoto.

Yu rejected calls for this to change, instead blaming foot-dragging by 
richer nations and leaving little doubt that talks leading to Copenhagen 
will be combative.

But failure to reach agreement by late next year could exact a terrible 
price, he said. Scientists have warned that growing levels of solar heat 
held in the atmosphere by a blanket of carbon dioxide and other 
pollutants are stoking droughts, melting glaciers and intensifying wild 
weather.

"I would not even try to contemplate," he said. "If we fail, the 
consequences would be disastrous for everybody."

German Foreign Minister Frank-Walter Steinmeier said last week the 
market difficulties would make it harder to agree a climate deal, while 
US Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama has said he might be 
forced to scale back his planned investments in energy.


CROSS-BORDER EMISSIONS

Spelling out China's demands, Yu said any final deal must reflect rich 
countries' responsibility for gases emitted during production of the 
many Chinese-made goods they consume.

He also firmly rejected calls for global emissions caps across 
high-polluting industrial sectors, such as steel-making.

These are favoured by Japan and some Western nations as a way of curbing 
emissions from developing nations without clamping down on more 
vulnerable sectors of the economy, but Yu said they were little more 
than an attack on China's competitiveness.

"You don't need to measure the efficiency level of a European country 
against the efficiency of a developing country. The result would be 
obvious. It would not be fair to use a so-called benchmark," Yu said.

Technology transfer is a particularly sore issue, with China frustrated 
by rich nations' attitude towards one element Beijing considers vital 
for any deal. Yu was dismissive of arguments that Western governments 
cannot mandate the transfer of patented technology held by companies.

"As national governments, once you make a commitment it is up to you to 
find the ways and tools to ensure that your commitments are met," he said.

China argues it is owed help to move towards a low-carbon economy.

It says despite high annual emissions, per-capita greenhouse pollution 
is well below that of rich peers and historically it pumped out much 
less than rich nations over the past two centuries since the start of 
the Industrial Revolution.

With little over a year until the negotiators gather to seek final 
agreement, Yu also said he hoped the United States under a new president 
would take "a more constructive and positive approach to the fight 
against climate change".

(For summit blog: http://summitnotebook.reuters.com/)

(Additional reporting by Emma Graham-Harrison; Editing by Nick Macfie)



Story by Chris Buckley and Emma Graham-Harrison

REUTERS NEWS SERVICE

 

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Try Facebook in Windows Live Messenger! Try it Now! 
<http://clk.atdmt.com/UKM/go/111354030/direct/01/>
__._,_.___
Messages in this topic 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion/message/8;_ylc=X3oDMTJ2OWJvNzFsBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRtc2dJZAM4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3Z0cGMEc3RpbWUDMTIyMzMzMjgzMQR0cGNJZAM4> 
(1) Reply (via web post) 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJuMXRrYzJtBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRtc2dJZAM4BHNlYwNmdHIEc2xrA3JwbHkEc3RpbWUDMTIyMzMzMjgzMQ--?act=reply&messageNum=8> 
| Start a new topic 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion/post;_ylc=X3oDMTJmOTdvbHNiBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNudHBjBHN0aW1lAzEyMjMzMzI4MzE-> 

Messages 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion/messages;_ylc=X3oDMTJmb2JvaHRlBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNtc2dzBHN0aW1lAzEyMjMzMzI4MzA-> 
| Files 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion/files;_ylc=X3oDMTJnaHBzZWdjBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNmaWxlcwRzdGltZQMxMjIzMzMyODMw> 
| Photos 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion/photos;_ylc=X3oDMTJmb3U1c25iBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNwaG90BHN0aW1lAzEyMjMzMzI4MzA-> 
| Links 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion/links;_ylc=X3oDMTJnamtwNmlnBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNsaW5rcwRzdGltZQMxMjIzMzMyODMw> 
| Database 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion/database;_ylc=X3oDMTJkODhsYjYxBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNkYgRzdGltZQMxMjIzMzMyODMw> 
| Polls 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion/polls;_ylc=X3oDMTJnNDU0djc0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNwb2xscwRzdGltZQMxMjIzMzMyODMw> 
| Members 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion/members;_ylc=X3oDMTJmM2pxY2h0BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNtYnJzBHN0aW1lAzEyMjMzMzI4MzA-> 
| Calendar 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion/calendar;_ylc=X3oDMTJlbmM5YWoyBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNjYWwEc3RpbWUDMTIyMzMzMjgzMA--> 

Yahoo! Groups 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/;_ylc=X3oDMTJlcTg3b2N2BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNnZnAEc3RpbWUDMTIyMzMzMjgzMQ--> 

Change settings via the Web 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion/join;_ylc=X3oDMTJncGY3cWo1BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNzdG5ncwRzdGltZQMxMjIzMzMyODMx> 
(Yahoo! ID required)
Change settings via email: Switch delivery to Daily Digest 
<mailto:[log in to unmask]:%20Digest> 
| Switch format to Traditional 
<mailto:[log in to unmask]:%20Traditional> 

Visit Your Group 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion;_ylc=X3oDMTJlMnA2NDI4BF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRzZWMDZnRyBHNsawNocGYEc3RpbWUDMTIyMzMzMjgzMQ--> 
| Yahoo! Groups Terms of Use <http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/> | 
Unsubscribe <mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Visit Your Group 
<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/kyoto2-discussion;_ylc=X3oDMTJmY291MDVuBF9TAzk3MzU5NzE0BGdycElkAzIyNTM5ODYxBGdycHNwSWQDMTcwNTA1OTM1NQRzZWMDdnRsBHNsawN2Z2hwBHN0aW1lAzEyMjMzMzI4MzA-> 

Yahoo! News

Kevin Sites 
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13o6frttb/M=493064.12016309.12445701.8674578/D=groups/S=1705059355:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1223340031/L=/B=Qc.4BkLaX.Q-/J=1223332831172781/A=3848607/R=0/SIG=10q7s9jm5/*http://hotzone.yahoo.com>

Get coverage of

world crises.

Dog Groups

on Yahoo! Groups 
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13o1fmj50/M=493064.12016263.12445670.8674578/D=groups/S=1705059355:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1223340031/L=/B=Qs.4BkLaX.Q-/J=1223332831172781/A=4836042/R=0/SIG=11o19ppl5/*http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/dogzone/index.html>

discuss everything

related to dogs.

Curves on Yahoo!

Share & discuss 
<http://us.ard.yahoo.com/SIG=13ps7r16q/M=493064.12016299.12445691.11322765/D=groups/S=1705059355:NC/Y=YAHOO/EXP=1223340031/L=/B=Q8.4BkLaX.Q-/J=1223332831172781/A=4990220/R=0/SIG=11odsb6gn/*http://new.groups.yahoo.com/Women_Of_Curves_Everywhere>

Curves, fitness

and weight loss.

.

__,_._,___

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

May 2018
January 2018
September 2016
May 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
September 2015
August 2015
May 2015
March 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
July 2004


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager