Thank you :)
On 24 Sep 2008, at 14:53, John Briggs wrote:
> Jez wrote:
>> So can I assume that no-one has any particular knowledge of what the
>> females might have sounded like?
>> Jez - getting back to the original question :)
> In the absence of evidence, there is no reason to assume that the
> females sounded (substantially) different from the males.
> John Briggs
If you have a Cloak of Invisibility, why would you have to wait until
Fundamental Flaws of Potterdom (1)