JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MINING-HISTORY Archives


MINING-HISTORY Archives

MINING-HISTORY Archives


mining-history@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY Home

MINING-HISTORY  August 2008

MINING-HISTORY August 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Marquis of Winchester and Cornish mines

From:

Roy Fellows <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

The mining-history list.

Date:

Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:37:55 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (140 lines)

I don't know if I am adding anything useful here but anyway, here goes.

You mention Sir Cornelius Vermuyden and Dr Jim Rieuwerts, I understand that
the latter is a descendant of the former and also I am the very proud
possessor of his excellent book "History and Gazetteer of the Lead Mine
Soughs of Derbyshire" which was a limited publication by subscription in
1987.

The problem is that a lot of eminent historians are not on the internet, I
am trying my best to gently coax certain parties in this direction.

Cornish mining was governed by Stannary Law and was an advantage up to the
passing of the Joint Stock Companies Act in 1844 and the later Limited
Liability Act of 1855. Cornish mines could operate as companies in the sense
of being independent entities whose shares could be bought and sold as with
any other commodity. Prior to those acts mining companies outside of
Cornwall could only be formed by act of parliament or royal letters patent
and the early Mining Journal is seeded with references such as "the bill for
the formation of our company has now received royal assent".
Unfortunately, even after the passing of those acts they did not apply to
Cornish mining until ratified by the Stannary parliament, and the final act
of 1856 which brought the earlier 2 acts together was not ratified by the
Stannaries until a year later. 
Mining companies formed under early Stannary Law where forced to continue as
Cost Book Companies even in the later part of the 19th century, the only way
out being to wind up and transfer all the assets to a new company formed as
Limited Liability. The Basset Mines for instance had to follow this route.
The whole legal position of mining companies in the 19th century is quite
involved and I will be submitting an article on this following some research
I have done for the WMS newsletter. If it receives favourable response I
shall make it available wider. I feel it is a matter little understood.

Hope that this is of some interest.


Roy Fellows 

-----Original Message-----
From: mining-history [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
sougher
Sent: 18 August 2008 18:02
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Marquis of Winchester and Cornish mines

Hi Ian,

As a Derbyshire "exile" now living in Hampshire I was intrigued by your
enquiry about the Marquis of Winchester and Cornish mines.   I know very
little about Cornish mines and their mining laws, I made a brief visit to
Cornwall way back in 1964 to visit the site of the Great County Adit, which
with the aid of directions sent to us by our friend Nellie Kirkham, the
Derbyshire lead mining historian, we were able to locate. I do, however,
know a lot about the history of the King's Field/Queeen's Field leadmining
area of Derbyshire's Peak District and it's perculiar industrial courts the
Barmote courts which stretch back to the 13th century, it's laws, methods of
working etc. etc.  So being curious I've done some research for you, as
Hampshire, apart from the suggestion that ironstone mining occured in the
New Forest  between Beaulieu and Lymington in the 1600 and 1700's, as far as
I am aware is devoid of any mines, it only has opencast workings for sand,
ballast and of course it's chalk pits.  I may be wrong and I'm sure I will
be corrected if any mines exist.   

The family name of the Marquis of Winchester was Paulet later Pawlett, and
is a Hampshire/Berkshire family.   The main family seat was Basing House in
the north of the county which was besieged and destroyed in the English
civil war.   Charles Paulet was the writer of the letter, he was the 6th
Marquis of Winchester.  He was born in 1625 and died 27/2/1699.  Charles
supported the claim of William and Mary to the throne in 1688, he was
restored to the Privy Council and created the lst Duke of Bolton in April,
1669.  His father John Paulet the 5th Marquis of Winchester (1598-1675)
represented St. Ives, Cornwall in the House of Commons as MP, being elected
on 7/12/1620 until 1622.  Through the Genuki website of Cornwall I
discovered that a co-heiress, one of two daughters of Sir Robert Willoughby,
2nd Lord Broke, by her marriage into the Paulet family during the reign of
Henry VIII brought with her as division of his estate the senior St Ives
Manor of Ludgvan Lese,  this encompassed lands in Ludgvan, Lelant, St. Ives
and Towednack.   Another reference refers to  "The Court Baron held at the
Guild Hall in St.Ives on 20/05/1724 - John Davy for making encroachment on
his Grace the Duke of Bolton's land in Trevalgan, in St. Ives - informant
Paul Stevens".  So with this information of the location of the family's
estate in St. Ives, anyone who is familiar with the mining areas around St.
Ives could investigate this enquiry futher.   There are records about this
family held both at Hampshire and Berkshire Record Offices and also two
deposits of Bedford Papers at the Cornwall Record Office.

Very interestingly I also found a letter on the internet dated October, 1630
written to John Paulet (5th Marquis of Winchester) at Winchester by a friend
Robert Weasenham from Downham Market, Norfolk (from a modern magazine called
Grantville Gazette).  He writes "However, mainly I write of the King's
Commission at Lynn this past week.   Attending on behalf of our family's
trading and estate interests, my brother and I heard that the proposal from
the King's embankment engineer Sir Cornelius Vermuyden to drain the Great
Fen has finally been agreed at the Privy Council, but in detail I have some
suprising news.   Lacking capital to the satisfaction of the Drainage
Commissioners, Veymuden is no longer undertaker of the venture.
Representations (and we are sure some monies) persuaded the commissioners
that future capital is required to complete the works".

Sir Cornelius Vermuyden the Dutchman greatly intrigues me, he is a
fasinating character and was reponsible for draining many parts of England,
including the Isle of Dogs, a waterway south of Sheffield, the Bedford Level
in the Fens and he had a lot of money troubles.  He is, however, famed in
Derbyshire for driving the first drainage level  to dewater a lead mine.  In
Derbyshire we call them soughs (pronouned "suffs"),  in Cornwall they are
called adits.  The sough was driven between 1631 to 1651 through Cromford
Hill to the Dovegang mines in Wirksworth mining liberty which at this time
were troubled by water problems.  (See "Glossary of Derbyshire Lead Mining
Terms" by J. H. Rieuwerts 1998; "The Tumultuous Course of Dovegang" by
Nellie Kirkham in Derbyshire Archaeological and Natural History Society's
Journal 1953, and "Old Drowned Work in Derbyshire" by Nellie Kirkham in
Derbyshire Archaeolgical and Natural History Society's Journal 1950 for
further information).  (My Coates ancestors from Cromford worked on this
sough and the Dovegang mines at this point in time).  Therefore, may I
suggest because of the link through this letter to Sir Cornelius Vermuyden
and the Paulet family, that the Paulet owned mines in Cornwall were perhaps
experiencing similar problems through water in their mines (?presumably
copper was being mined at this date) as the Derbyshire mines were.
Gunpowder was used in the Ecton Copper mines in Staffordshire just over the
Derbyshire border in about 1670 or possibly earlier, this allowed rock to be
broken up much quicker and easier than the earlier hand methods of driving.
From the website (www.cornish-mining.org.uk) I found that Thomas EPSLEY was
asked to demonstrate the use of gunpowder to the miners at Breage district
in 1689.  These were the times before "fire" engines were introduced into
mines to dewater them (1718 at the Yates Stoop Mine, Winster was the date of
the first Newcomen engine installed by the Quakers of the London Lead
Company in Derbyshire).   Therefore, with Charles Paulet's knowledge as a
mine owner of drainage and gunpowder could not the "Levills" mentioned in
his letter refer to drainage levels?  By draining the mines more efficiently
deposits of ore were found at greater depths.

I trust that this information assists you in finding the "Levills" referred
to in this letter of 1686/87, it would be interesting to discover more.
Incidently with finding reference to this letter in the North Yorkshire
Records Office is there a possibility that the Paulet family also owned
mines in the Northern Pennines, just a thought.

Kind regards,

Margaret Howard

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
October 2022
September 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager