JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Archives


MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH Home

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH  August 2008

MIDWIFERY-RESEARCH August 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Stacy Sheer traditional midwife

From:

"Mead, Marianne M" <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research." <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 15 Aug 2008 09:07:41 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (124 lines)

It is a huge organisation and these things will take time, perhaps even several months before you hear anything.  It is quite possible that they will hear your voice as just one discordant tone that may be at odds with whatever else they may be told or believe, and that they will investigate before coming to a decision.  If fact, that would have to investigate rather than take the judgment of a single person.  For them, you have to understand that it may be a case of "innocent until proven guilty".  I understand how frustrating this is, particularly when you look at it from the point of view of the support of women, and that one more of the intolerable episiotomies or deliveries is one too many, but an investigation would be absolutely necessary before such an organisation was to deliver a strong criticism.

It is also of course possible that WHO does not see this as its remit.  I don't know but it is possible.  I don't have their statutes but it is possible that even an investigation is outside the rights they have as an organisation.  I presume that the Dominican Republic is a member of WHO, but it is also possible that membership is at the condition that such criticisms cannot be made specifically against a particular country.  I don't know, but I imagine that such political "nicities" may have to be observed for WHO to continue its work.  I would imagine that even if WHO takes this on board and makes moves towards that government health authorities, it is unlikely that anyone else would be privy to those negotiations.

That is just my personal opinion.  I have no idea how the WHO works in practice, but I imagine that there will be a lot of diplomacy and politics involved.  Hopefully, interventions may be useful behind the scenes and your raising the issue may add to the weight of opposition to these practices.

You have done what you could by raising the issue far more widely and this may have an effect, but I think you should think at medium or long term and not at immediate or short term.  It is even likely that you will not personnaly see any change for some time because people who practise this way actually think they are doing what is right.  They are not nasty pieces of work who aim to mutilate women.  They are also stuck in a system that is dehumanising for both carers and patients.  A lot of work will have to be done before the mind set of the authorities, the economics of health care, the beliefs of professionals and the empowerement of women will lead to any changes.  Nonetheless, whatever we can do is useful and may add to the pressure that the government or the professionals may feel eventually impossible to resist.

I hope that despite the negativism of the response, you feel really good about the fact that you have disseminated the information.  Many thanks for having done it for those of us who had no idea.  I certainly did not have any idea at all.

Best wishes

Marianne
________________________________________
From: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research. [[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of STACY SHEER [[log in to unmask]]
Sent: 15 August 2008 03:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Stacy Sheer traditional midwife

Why do I get no response from the WHO rep in Santo Domingo? Why?


On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 8:16 AM, Ruth Montgomery-Andersen <[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote:

Midwives,



This type of violence and misuse of women is exactly what ICM has been talking about and trying to heighten the  aware of over the past 10 years.  I think that it is important to look at the initiatives that already are in action and see if we can use them to heighten awareness and to change the situation for the women worldwide.



Obstetrical  violence is a problem anywhere where women are kept subjugated, where there is poverty and where there is illiteracy.



All of the midwives who have answered Stacey have come with constructive suggestions to initiatives that can and must be taken in order to change this situation.  Céline Lemay, words about respectful  maternity care for women is one of keys.



Inussiarnersumik inuulluaqqusillunga/Med venlig hilsen / Sincerely

Ruth Montgomery-Andersen MPH, Dr. PhD Stud

NAPA

Paasissutissiinermik Sulisoq/Informationsmedarbejder

Information Consultant

Box 770

DK 3900 Nuuk

Kalaallit Nunaat/ Grřnland/Greenland

Tel. +299 324733 Fax: 325733

Cell: +299 559340

www.napa.gl<http://www.napa.gl>



Fra: A forum for discussion on midwifery and reproductive health research. [mailto:[log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>] Pĺ vegne af Céline Lemay
Sendt: 13. august 2008 09:34
Til: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>
Emne: Re: Stacy Sheer traditional midwife



Dear Stacey,



You describe something similar I witnessed in an African hospital a few years ago.

I think that in a lot of places around the world, exist what I consider as "obstetrical violence". It is institutionalised and women become captive clients because they need care and help for childbirth.

Domestic violence, sexual abuse and  incest are subject that are discussed openly now and targeted in prevention programs. Mysteriously, obstetrical violence seems one of the last "taboo" almost everywere. Omerta law.

Maternal mortality is a big problem but when women are abused like that and become survivor of obstetrical "care", we are facing a much bigger problem. (nobody is doing that even to animals).



May be there is time to do some "advocacy" for women. Respectfull maternity care is women's right and is human's right.



I hope that ICM will start to speak out about that. Complex and difficult because often we are part of a system that allow abusive interventions.





In solidarity,



Céline Lemay, sage-femme, PhD

----- Original Message -----

From: STACY SHEER<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

To: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]>

Sent: Tuesday, August 12, 2008 12:05 PM

Subject: Stacy Sheer traditional midwife



Hi,
I found this group upon returning this past Sunday from a week long trip to work in a birthing hospital in the Dominican Republic. I am a traditional midwife and I live in the US. Upon my return, I sent this letter to a statewide midwifery organization asking what could be done. They directed me to you, attached is my letter. Please take the time time to read it and let me know your thoughts, thank you-much love-Stacy


__________ Information from ESET Smart Security, version of virus signature database 3351 (20080813) __________


The message was checked by ESET Smart Security.

http://www.eset.com

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager