On 28 Aug 2008 at 18:43, Martin Holland wrote:
> I agree. Anyway for a faecal fat to be valid the person should be on a
> "normal" diet containing at least 70g of fat per day. Again, who is
> advising them? Are they looking for sensationalism, rather than valid
> science?
Perhaps we should remember the old IT saying "garbage in,
garbage out" . . .
Best wishes mto all
David
PS: A plea from someone with Latin O level [and at grade A,
however long ago and however dumbed down that may be] - if it
should have a diphthong give it a diphthong - don't give us any of
that American "feces" . . .
PPS: After all, "s***" and "c***" are both one letter shorter, if you're
really wanting brevity & clarity
------ACB discussion List Information--------
This is an open discussion list for the academic and clinical
community working in clinical biochemistry.
Please note, archived messages are public and can be viewed
via the internet. Views expressed are those of the individual and
they are responsible for all message content.
ACB Web Site
http://www.acb.org.uk
List Archives
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/lists/ACB-CLIN-CHEM-GEN.html
List Instructions (How to leave etc.)
http://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/
|