I vote for an inclusive BB - it is easy to delete the irrelevent (to
you) messages, and nice to know there is a helpful community out there
who are prepared to help..
Presumably copyright violations do not result from sharing with one
request..
Eleanor
Jayashankar wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> Scott has good point.And the requesting party should reply to these kind
> mails very quickly ,so as to avoid of receiving huge number of same paper
> from different persons,(such a basic sense is important to avoid of wasting
> others time.)
>
> thanks.
> (still am confused about how far or how much a commercial people(non
> academic) can access this BB)
>
> On Tue, Jul 15, 2008 at 4:01 PM, William G. Scott <
> [log in to unmask]> wrote:
>
>
>> It is impossible to know when someone has an anonymous user name and email
>> address.
>>
>> I would suggest, minimally, that if someone asks us to send a paper, they
>> need to sign their
>> correspondence unambiguously (name and institution). Also, several requests
>> in the span of
>> three weeks from the same user gets really annoying.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jul 15, 2008, at 2:40 AM, Martyn Winn wrote:
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>>> There seems to be an increasing number of requests for articles on the
>>> BB. Can we assume that those supplying articles hold the necessary
>>> copyright permissions? Since the BB is visible and archived, I just want
>>> to be sure everything is nice and legal.
>>>
>>> regards
>>> Martyn
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
>
|