JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  June 2008

CCP4BB June 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: crystallisation and mosaicity

From:

Juergen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Juergen Bosch <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Thu, 5 Jun 2008 09:06:46 -0700

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (141 lines)

Hi Charlie,

yes you are right, but I assumed if people see a cloud of condensed fog 
over their LN2 bath they should remove that by
a) filling up the bowl completely e.g. some LN2 drips out of the bowl
b) blow the fog away before you dip
c) ask someone for advice

In general I have observed much better results with cryo-cooling 
crystals by plunging  them into LN2 versus mounting them on a blocked 
cryostream and then unblock it. Some tend also just to swing the crysal 
onto the goniometer head without worrying about the cryostream, so the 
crystal is cooled while it is mounted. Unless you have a very good cryo, 
this procedure will result in bad reproducibility and most likely very 
often in badly frozen crystals.

Just my 3 eurocents,

Juergen

Charlie Bond wrote:

> I seem to recall an explanation a few years ago that a problem with 
> dunking into liquid nitrogen is that a cushion of nitrogen gas 
> persists around the crystal/loop so that 'freezing' is not so 
> reproducible (hopefully an expert will elaborate on this). The same 
> problem doesn't exist with liquid propane, but it has other issues...
>
> I generally default to using the cryostream unless I know by 
> experiment that dunking works.
>
> Cheers,
> Charlie
>
> Ohren, Jeffrey wrote:
>
>> Could it be that evaporation on the way from the microscope to the cold
>> stream increases the effective cryo concentration as well as causing a
>> beneficial dehydration effect?
>> There are quite a few publications that have carefully evaluated
>> optimizing cryo cooling. Check out Elspeth Garman's many excellent
>> papers on the subject as well as J. Appl. Cryst. (2006). 39, 244-251;
>> Methods 34 (2004) 415-423 and Acta Cryst. (2002). D58, 459-471, to name
>> a few.
>> Jeff
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: CCP4 bulletin board [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
>> Paul Paukstelis
>> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2008 11:59 PM
>> To: [log in to unmask]
>> Subject: Re: [ccp4bb] crystallisation and mosaicity
>>
>> I have also observed this. In my cases I have also been able to get away
>>
>> with using less cryoprotectant when freezing in the cryostream.
>>
>> --paul
>>
>> Daniel Pomeranz Krummel wrote:
>>
>>> Dear Sajid,
>>>
>>> I have observed a consistent reduction in mosaicity (from approx. 0.95
>>
>> to
>>
>>> 0.45) for one case by freezing the crystals in a cryostream (N2
>>
>> vapour) as
>>
>>> opposed to submerging in liquid nitrogen.
>>>
>>> Have others observed this?
>>>
>>> Daniel
>>>  
>>>
>>>> Dear All
>>>>
>>>> My protein size is ~30kD and crystallizes with
>>>> 19%Peg3350, 0.2M Nacl, and 0.1M Na Cacodylate buffer.
>>>>
>>>> Please refer the attached crystal image with this. The
>>>> crystal looks like good enough for home source. These
>>>> crystals appears in 4-5 days at room temp.
>>>>
>>>> Sometimes I'm getting crystals like this, but very few
>>>> in 24 well tray. Most of the time, I found the drop
>>>> contains needles. If I reduce the precipitant little
>>>> bit, I wont find any change in the drop even after
>>>> long time. Changing pH (or temp)of the buffer does not
>>>> help me any better. The crystal appears only around
>>>> 5.5pH.
>>>>
>>>> The problem is mosaicity. This crystal diffracted in
>>>> home source upto 3.2A and the mosaicity is 2.5degree.
>>>> Almost all the good crystal like this having same
>>>> mosaicity.
>>>>
>>>> Good cryo condition so far that I found was
>>>> 10%Glycerol with mother liquor. Other conditions
>>>> weekens the diffraction quality or increase mosaicity.
>>>>
>>>> In many crystal I could see some crack in the middle
>>>> of the crystal, it looks like twin crystal. Or the
>>>> crystal appears with some sattelite crystals.
>>>>
>>>> Can anyone suggest me some good way to overcome these
>>>> problems.
>>>>
>>>> Thankz
>>>>
>>>> Sajid
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>       From Chandigarh to Chennai - find friends all over India. Go to
>>>> http://in.promos.yahoo.com/groups/citygroups/
>>>>     
>>>
>>>   
>>
>>
>>
>> .
>>
>


-- 
Jürgen Bosch
University of Washington
Dept. of Biochemistry, K-426
1705 NE Pacific Street
Seattle, WA 98195
Box 357742
Phone: 	 +1-206-616-4510
FAX:	 +1-206-685-7002
Web:     http://faculty.washington.edu/jbosch

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager