JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for LIS-MEDICAL Archives


LIS-MEDICAL Archives

LIS-MEDICAL Archives


LIS-MEDICAL@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

LIS-MEDICAL Home

LIS-MEDICAL Home

LIS-MEDICAL  June 2008

LIS-MEDICAL June 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Splitting the list to separate out ILL requests? **Delete if time too valuable to read...**

From:

Mark Kerr <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Mark Kerr <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Fri, 6 Jun 2008 11:29:07 +0100

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (195 lines)

Perhaps if someone with too much time on their hands could compare the number of people who have submitted or responded to a request (i.e. the colleagues who have sought and received generous assistance from other colleagues) against the number of those who are too busy to hit the delete button occasionally or do a proper set of filtering rules (but not to email the list about it), we'd have some evidence one way or another... (we should ignore the silent majority in both cases as they are clearly too sensible to get involved either way) and why aren't they complaining about the jobs and journal duplicates? What is it about ILLs that generate such passion? And do you also demand that Waterstones only stocks items in which they are personally interested? EBM = Evidence Based Moaning perhaps?

Sorry, Friday mania seems to have caught me...

ps. I vote for not splitting the list. Again. Sigh.

Mark



--------------------------------------------------------
Mark Kerr                           (x76020)
Clinical Librarian, EKHT
Kent and Canterbury Hospital
East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust
Ethelbert Road, Canterbury
Kent, CT1 3NG

01227 864354 (Library)
01227 864156 (Direct Line)
01227 864154 (FAX)
----------------------------------------------------

>>> "Hodgson, Julian" <[log in to unmask]> 06/06/2008 11:01 >>>

The number of responses don't seem to warrant any change so far.

Julian Hodgson
Librarian
Wishaw General Hospital
Alistair Mackenzie Library
Ronald Miller Education Centre
Netherton Street
Wishaw
ML2 0DP
 
01698 366316
[log in to unmask] 
 
SHELCAT is now live!
Shelcat is a new on-line catalogue that enables you to search the stock
of all the libraries in NHS Lanarkshire, and 41 other participating
libraries.   Library members can also renew loans and request items
on-line.   Logon to www.shelcat.org/la to search our catalogue.
 

-----Original Message-----
From: UK medical/ health care library community / information workers
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Toni Price
Sent: 06 June 2008 10:40
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: Splitting the list to separate out ILL requests? An
analysis of the replies
Importance: Low

....perhaps we need a more scientific approach to this, if a decision is
going to be made on who actually posts a response....? Just a
thought....

Toni Price
Information Specialist
NICE
ext 3089
Direct line 0161 8703089
 
-----Original Message-----
From: UK medical/ health care library community / information workers
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Susan LaceyBryant
Sent: 06 June 2008 10:38
To: [log in to unmask] 
Subject: Re: Splitting the list to separate out ILL requests? An
analysis of the replies

and another in favour = 13. 

happy friday. 

Sue Lacey Bryant 

Jason Harper writes: 

> Please can you make that 12 in favour of splitting the list?  Since
this discussion took place, and the reminder to use the correct message
header went out, there have been quite a few ILL requests sent to the
list that have been incorrectly badged, and which my mail filter has not
been able to pick up... 
> 
> With thanks,
> Jason 
> 
> Jason Harper
> Assistant Librarian for the Sciences and Social Sciences
> Templeman Library
> University of Kent
> Canterbury
> Kent CT2 7NU 
> 
> E-mail: [log in to unmask] 
> Telephone: 01227 827608 
> 
>   
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: UK medical/ health care library community / information workers
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Chris Fowler
> Sent: 05 June 2008 17:52
> To: [log in to unmask] 
> Subject: Re: Splitting the list to separate out ILL requests? An
analysis of the replies 
> 
> Thank you for everyone who replied to me on this subject.  Here are
the results: 
> 
> Don't Split - 17 in favour
> Split - 11 in favour
> Don't mind - 2 replies
> Union list suggestions - 2 replies
> Use existing ILL list - 1 reply
> Use 'Digest' mode - 1 reply 
> 
> Many people commented on the need to maintain a strict format in the
message header so that those folks who don't want to see ILL requests
can set up email filters to remove them.  Diane Job's email of 4 Oct
2007 refers. 
> 
> For the few who asked about UHMLG, this is the University Health and
Medical Librarians Group whose pages are at http://www.uhmlg.ac.uk 
> 
> 
> Chris Fowler
> University of Southampton library
> [log in to unmask] 
> 
 

__________________________

Delivered via MessageLabs
__________________________

_______________________

Scanned by MessageLabs
_______________________

NHS Lanarkshire Confidentiality and Disclaimer Notice

***********************************************************************************************************************************************

The information contained in this email may be subject to public
disclosure under the Freedom of Information (Scotland) Act 2002.

This email is intended only for the addressee named above and the
contents should not be disclosed to any other person or copies
taken. Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the
sender and do not necessarily represent those of NHS Lanarkshire
(NHSL) unless otherwise specifically stated. 
As Internet communications are not secure NHSL do not accept legal
responsibility for the contents of this message or responsibility
for any change made to this message after the original sender sent
it.
 
We advise you to carry out your own virus check before opening any
attachment, as we cannot accept liability for any damage sustained
as a result of any software viruses.

If you have received this email in error, please contact the IM&T
Helpdesk on 01698 258787 between 08:30 and 17:15 Monday to Friday.

http://www.nhslanarkshire.org.uk/ 

***********************************************************************************************************************************************

**********************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential and intended
solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom they are addressed.
Any views or opinions presented are solely those of the author and do 
not necessarily represent those of East Kent Hospitals NHS Trust.  If
you are not the intended recipient, be advised that you have received
this email in error and that any use, dissemination, forwarding, printing
or copying of this email is strictly prohibited.

If you have received this email in error please notify the system
manager at the following email address: [log in to unmask]

www.kentandmedway.nhs.uk

This footnote also confirms that although this email message has been
swept by MIMEsweeper for the presence of computer viruses, it is strongly 
recommended that you carry out your own virus scan of this
message and any attachments.

www.mimesweeper.com
**********************************************************************

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000
1999
1998


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager