JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB Archives

CCP4BB Archives


CCP4BB@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB Home

CCP4BB  June 2008

CCP4BB June 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: pH gradient in Mono Q

From:

Thomas J Magliery PhD <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Thomas J Magliery PhD <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Tue, 24 Jun 2008 16:16:19 -0400

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (149 lines)

It is entirely possible to elute from a MonoQ matrix with a change in 
pH.  It will not ruin the column between pH 2-12.  Phosphate or Tris or 
a mix of buffers would be fine.  It would be difficult, except for a 
monoprotic buffer in a narrow range, to achieve a truly linear gradient 
of pH.  I don't see why this really matters.  As long as you find 
conditions at which the protein binds, and then conditions at which the 
protein but not everything else in the mixture elutes, you win.  It is 
also common to elute from a MonoQ with salt, or with a mix of salt and 
pH gradient.  Nadir is right below that for a quaternary amine resin, 
you are titrating relative to the pI of the protein, since the matrix 
will be positively charged at all pH values.  That means you need to 
bind at a pH higher than the pI (so that the protein is net negative) 
and titrate toward the pI (lower pH) to reduce the affinity for the 
positive resin.  See:

http://www5.gelifesciences.com/aptrix/upp00919.nsf/Content/71857706466D1AB8C1256EB40041805D/$file/11000421AA.pdf

Tom


Nadir T. Mrabet wrote:
>
> Michael,
>
> Well, why do you need to titrate the exchanger rather then the 
> proteins themselves?
> MonoQ is a lot simpler to adjust pHwise, as with DEAE you actually 
> titrate both the matrix and the proteins.
> Recommended buffers to use are Goods' (pKa from 8 to 6.15 at 20 °C) + 
> acetic acid (pKa 4.76).
> An equimolar (50mM) mixture of these with Buffer A titrated to 8.0 and 
> Buffer titrated to 4.0 has been
> shown (in  my hands) to yield a very linear gradient (must not be too 
> steep, though).
>
> Matthew's question does not seem to concern chromatofocusing.
>
> Hth,
>
> Nadir
>
> -- 
>
> Pr. Nadir T. Mrabet
>    Cellular & Molecular Biochemistry
>    INSERM U-724
>    Nancy University, School of Medicine
>    9, Avenue de la Foret de Haye, BP 184
>    54505 Vandoeuvre-les-Nancy Cedex
>    France
>    Phone: +33 (0)3.83.68.32.73
>    Fax:   +33 (0)3.83.68.32.79
>    E-mail: [log in to unmask]
>   
>
> R.M. Garavito wrote:
>> Matthew,
>>
>> You're not going to ruin your column, but you won't get great 
>> performance either.  Elution by pH change is a very common method, 
>> but getting a really linear pH gradient is very hard.  The Mono Q 
>> matrix is a strong anion exchanger, meaning that it is insensitive to 
>> pH changes, i.e., you can't titrate it smoothly with acid or base.  
>> DEAE resins, which are weak anion exchangers, have a nice pH 
>> titration curve and lend themselves better to elution by pH change.  
>> This is the reason chromatofocusing is not a commonly used method, 
>> and its expensive. 
>> Andreas has pointed you in the general direction for 
>> chromatofocusing, but there is a "poor man's" way to do it.  We use 
>> this method a lot, and the key is using a weak ion exchanger (like 
>> DEAE or CM) and a mix of buffers with pKas that span the titration 
>> range you want to exploit.  Remember, you actually want to titrate 
>> the resin with the buffer: as the pH shifts away from the pKa of one 
>> buffer component, it moves into the buffering range of the other.  If 
>> you do it correctly, you get a nice, flatter titration curve from the 
>> resin, which spreads out the release of the proteins.  We have used a 
>> mixture of Tris and Bis-Tris-Propane with a HiTrap-DEAE or 
>> Sepharose-DEAE FF columns.
>>
>> Hope this helps,
>>
>> Michael
>>
>> /****************************************************************/
>>
>> /R. Michael Garavito, Ph.D./
>>
>> /Professor of Biochemistry & Molecular Biology/
>>
>> /513 Biochemistry Bldg.   /
>>
>> /Michigan State University      /
>>
>> /East Lansing, MI 48824-1319/
>>
>> /Office://  //(517) 355-9724     Lab:  (517) 353-9125/
>>
>> /FAX:  (517) 353-9334        Email:  [log in to unmask] 
>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>/
>>
>> /****************************************************************/
>>
>>
>>
>> On Jun 24, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Matthew Chu wrote:
>>
>>> Dear All,
>>>
>>> Sorry for off-topic question. Does anyone have any experience in 
>>> purifying protein using pH gradient in Mono Q column?
>>>
>>> I have been googling for a whole day, only one paper was found to 
>>> mention performing pH gradient in Mono Q, but in a mixture of amine 
>>> buffering species, which is a bit too complicated (J. Chromatogr. A 
>>> 1164 (2007) 181 - 188. Can Tris-Cl/Tris-base or phosphate buffer 
>>> give a linear pH gradient from pH 8.0 to 4.0? Is it usual to perform 
>>> pH gradient in Mono Q as I don't want to ruin my Mono Q column...
>>>
>>> Any suggestions are welcome. Thanks in advance!
>>>
>>> Kind regards,
>>> Matt
>>>
>>>  
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>
>>> Matthew LH Chu
>>> PhD Student
>>> School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences
>>> University of Manchester
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- 
>>>
>>

-- 
Thomas J. Magliery, Ph.D.
Assistant Professor
Department of Chemistry
& Department of Biochemistry
The Ohio State University
1043 Evans Laboratory
100 West 18th Ave.
Columbus, OH 43210-1185

(614) 247-8425 office
(614) 292-1685 fax
[log in to unmask]
http://www.chemistry.ohio-state.edu/~magliery

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

April 2024
March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager