Hi there,
Thanks for sharing this Bridget. I have to say I'm not surprised by
Carole's announcement. HLF and other funders have a duty to put their
money where they can see tangible benefits for people. This is the
context we're operating within, and as sectoral funding is reduced
organisations like HLF are going to have to make tough decisions and
focus on areas where museums can really demonstrate practical value for
their audiences.
I don't think we should criticise HLF for this. The onus is on us as
museums to demonstrate the success (or otherwise) of digitisation
projects and communicate this back up to government stakeholders and
funding bodies. We have traditionally been pretty good at doing this in
terms of process (number of digitised images, skills acquired, costs
involved, technical standards adhered to and so on). In general terms
though, we have been unable or unwilling to try and demonstrate success
in terms of project outcomes and public impact, which is what funders
like HLF really care about.
It seems that this is now coming back to haunt us.
In my view, before embarking on more mass digitisation we need to
collectively become much more savvy at understanding and advocating the
value of all this to the 'real' people that Carole quite rightly talks
about. If we can't or won't do that, then we can't expect them to
continue awarding large-scale public funding for digitisation.
Cheers,
Dylan
Dylan Edgar
London Hub ICT Development Officer
London Transport Museum
39 Wellington Street
London WC2E 7BB
Direct line: 07711 148133
Email: [log in to unmask]
-----Original Message-----
From: Museums Computer Group [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of
Bridget McKenzie
Sent: 01 May 2008 13:05
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: 21st Century digital curation
I just posted this on my blog. Any advances on my suggestions about what
such lead bodies should be doing to invest in 21st century digital
curation?
"I went to a seminar at UCL last night, to hear Roy Clare, CEO of the
MLA and Carole Souter, CEO of HLF talking about the future, the funding
context and how their respective bodies will contribute to curation in
the 21st Century. I'm not going to supply a full transcript of the
event, but have picked up a key issue about digital strategy.
Carole Souter insisted that the HLF would not fund digitisation (only
'real people doing real things'). She conceded that there could be some
catchy, engaging digital culture projects, for example the Tate's
campaign inviting the public to buy a brushstroke of a painting. A
questioner asked 'Call me naive, but surely if digitisation is what we
are crying out for, why do you make these restrictions?' The response
was 'We're getting tough with people. You have to look at the breadth of
our aims. We're an additional funder, not a funder of core activities.
If you tell us that 200,000 more people are going to look at your
website because of it, well, so what? How do you know they have really
been engaged?' So, her suggestion was that if you are going to include
digitisation into an HLF bid, it would have to involve people in
specific thematic projects of local interest.
Roy Clare highlighted the NOF Digitise project as an example of where we
went wrong in assuming that mass digitisation and online publishing of
collections would be engaging. He said that when he (when at the
National Maritime Museum) and partners were planning Port Cities
http://www.portcities.org.uk/: 'Did we think about how anybody would
ever find it? How they would engage with it?' His response seemed to
suggest that we shouldn't do digitisation because these projects were
difficult to market.
However, my argument would be that the NOF projects are an example of
the limited thematic trap that the HLF approach to digital culture
encourages. The Port Cities project may not be as successful as it could
have been precisely because they made too much effort to define a theme,
to define a collaboration between several museums, to focus on
particular markets and so on.
What is needed is a flexible approach to digitisation that enables
collection items to be presented in multiple thematic, social,
institutional and technological contexts and to be interpreted in
multiple ways and combined with other collections in multiple ways.
Investment in a) the continuation of mass digitisation and b) in
incubating approaches to tagging, indexing, syndicating etc are what we
need now, and we should see this being championed as the core of 21st
Century Curation by bodies such as MLA and HLF."
The new London Transport Museum is now open! Enjoy a dramatic world cities welcome gallery... rich design collections on permanent display... even more for families... exciting new exhibitions about the past, present and future of transport in London. Plan your visit now at www.ltmuseum.co.uk
_______________________________________________________________________
This email and any attachments are confidential and intended solely for the use of the addressee. If you have received this in error please notify [log in to unmask] and delete immediately. Any use, disclosure, forwarding, printing or copying of this email is strictly prohibited. London Transport Museum (LTM) hereby excludes any warranty and any liability as to the quality or accuracy of the contents of this email and any attached transmitted files.
LTM may monitor all email communications through its internal and external networks.
LTM is a division of Transport Trading Limited, part of Transport for London (TFL), Windsor House, 42-50 Victoria Street, London SW1H 0TL
Registered in England and Wales
Company number 3914810
VAT 756 2770 08
Copyright in this email and attachments belongs to TFL.
This email and attachments have been swept for the presence of computer viruses and LTM accepts no responsibility for any virus imported with this document.
**************************************************
For mcg information and to manage your subscription to the list, visit the website at http://www.museumscomputergroup.org.uk
**************************************************
|