JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Archives


NEW-MEDIA-CURATING@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING Home

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING  May 2008

NEW-MEDIA-CURATING May 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Exclusivity and Heresy | Alternative academic criteria

From:

Myron Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Myron Turner <[log in to unmask]>

Date:

Mon, 5 May 2008 09:08:19 -0500

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (69 lines)

he system of "publish or perish" in the U.S. goes back at least to the 
early 50's. It's my impression, though, that at that time in England 
academia was rather clubby and that publication was not required for 
membership. When I came to teach in Canada in the mid 60's, we had what 
the University considered was a British system, no tenure, but a person 
would be hired "without term" after a year's employment. Now that may 
not have been an accurate reflection of what went on in England. But it 
did mean that the teaching faculty had a great deal of latitude. The 
university exercised control through promotion and salaries; teaching 
and committee responsibilities were the same for everyone. I had the 
impression that things were in fact pretty similar in the UK. In fact, 
the system seemed pretty much the reverse of what Simon describes today. 
Living in London in 1975, I met with someone in my field who was a very 
productive scholar, but she seemed overwhelmed by University 
responsibilities and had to squeeze in time for her research.

The creative arts have always been a difficult fit for the university. 
Simon's account of the "point" system (in a previous post) describes 
something that would be laughable if it weren't true. It sounds like a 
last ditch effort to interpose a simulacrum of objectivity between art 
and the requirements of the academic institutions. Even with refereed 
journals, we know, there is subjectivity of judgment, but with art 
subjectivity is the name of the game. And from this perspective the 
point system is ironically as good as any for institutionalizing the 
practice of art. For, technique apart, what does "peer review" mean in 
art, if not one sensibility caroming off another? I have a friend whose 
self-esteem never survived his failure to be promoted to full professor 
on the basis of his fiction. He was turned down by his "peers", all of 
whom were part of a close group interested in the same things. Had we 
had a point system, perhaps this man would have been successful. Who knows?

Despite the difficulty of fitting the arts into a university paradigm, I 
cannot imagine a university where they were not taught. Or, I should 
say, to imagine such a university, would be to imagine a landscape 
barren and benighted.


Myron Turner


Simon Biggs wrote:
> In the UK we have a word for it...Utilitarianism. Jonathon Bentham advocated
> this ethical system in the 19th century. He also founded University College
> London, one of the key institutions for research in the UK, as well as the
> foundations of the welfare state, the penal system and aspects of
> contemporary governance. Bentham was, in some respects, a pioneer of extreme
> patrician socialism.
>
> Much of the UK system derives from his ideas and in this respect there is
> nothing new about what we see happening. Academia in the UK has always been
> typified by this approach. That we see the creative arts subject to the same
> logic is not surprising. If you seek to Œsupš at the same table as others
> you will be subject to the same obligations. Put another way, there are
> always strings attached.
>
> This Utilitarian approach to education, industry and social development is
> possibly the key distinction between the Anglo-American and European models
> of knowledge and its production/dissemination. The Bologna process is
> largely based on this Anglo-American model so it will be interesting to see
> what happens as it collides with European tradition. Who knows what the
> outcome might be?
>   

__
Myron Turner
http://www.room535.org
http://www.mturner.org
http://net18reaching.org/cityscapes

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager