On Wed, May 21, 2008 at 10:01 AM, Andy Powell
<[log in to unmask]> wrote:
> The comment in
> http://dublincore.org/documents/dcmi-terms/#terms-description says:
>
> Description may include but is not limited to: an abstract, a table of
> contents, a graphical representation, or a free-text account of the
> resource.
>
> On that basis dcterms:description is *not* limited to being a literal.
OK, but then surely dcterms:abstract should be a literal?
> (I'm not sure if the comment makes it into the machine-readable
> declaration of dcterms:description which is why you might have missed
> it?).
Ah, I was looking for a "note" as in some of the other properties.
Bruce
|