Thanks Doug and Patrick for your intrigues, enthusiasm.
Yes, I think a metric that produces 'fissures' is inherently intriguing, say, as different from concocting an 'edifice' that inherently proclaims authorial control and direction, as such often does.
Any way the 'cracked' metrics that are deduced from Trevor Joyce's own often oddly contstructed metrics(from his book, What's In Store) I have found rather joyful to work with - particularly in that I never know what I am going to get,or, it might be days after to see what I got!
Stephen V
http://stephenvincent.net/blog/
Douglas Barbour <[log in to unmask]> wrote: Intriguing to deceive, maybe to lift the sublime, Stephen? I enjoy the
way this practice turns up such possibilities...
Doug
On 15-Apr-08, at 9:28 AM, Stephen Vincent wrote:
> Go meta-
> physical or
> Try me not once
> Spectacles
> Intrigue to deceive
> The stone
> Opaque
> Witness
> Liquefies
>
> Frigid
> Structure
> Loose volume
>
> Fierce such compression
> Ze-
> ro degrees
>
> Split the
> Gracious
> Lifting sublime
> Is
> An old term:
> Fissure delights.
>
> Stephen Vincent
> from TRELLIS
> a work in progress
>
>
Douglas Barbour
[log in to unmask]
http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/
Latest books:
Continuations (with Sheila E Murphy)
http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp?LID=41&bookID=664
Wednesdays'
http://abovegroundpress.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-from-aboveground-press_10.html
A little planet blues, for the
deathwatch.
A season of rictus riffs.
Dennis Lee
|