Hi all,
P36 in Schmid reads "As is the case to-day, already in Roman times hares
were sold without fur, but with the fur still on the paws. This was done
to avoid deception with cats (in German and Switzerland known as "roof
hare"."
Best wishes, Jessica Grimm
-----Original Message-----
From: Analysis of animal remains from archaeological sites
[mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of lena strid
Sent: Wednesday, April 09, 2008 1:33 PM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: [ZOOARCH] cats being passed off as rabbits
Monika Doll mentions it in her thesis ("Haustierhaltung und
Schlachtsitten des Mittelalters und der Neuzeit", 2003), and refers to
Elisabeth Schmid's "Atlas of animal bones", page 36. I only have
excerpts from the bone atlas, so I can't check the reference for you.
/Lena
-----Original Message-----
From: Analysis of animal remains from archaeological sites
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]On Behalf Of L J Gidney@durham ac uk
Sent: 09 April 2008 12:45
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: cats being passed off as rabbits
Hello everyone,
Many years ago I had a reference to the practice of leaving the paws on
skinned rabbits, to stop the unscrupulous from passing off skinned cats
as rabbits. I now have no idea where I have put this. All suggestions
for the source of this reference gratefully accepted.
Thanks, Louisa
------
Files attached to this email may be in ISO 26300 format (OASIS Open
Document Format). If you have difficulty opening them, please visit
http://iso26300.info for more information.
|