JiscMail Logo
Email discussion lists for the UK Education and Research communities

Help for POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC Archives

POETRYETC Archives


POETRYETC@JISCMAIL.AC.UK


View:

Message:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Topic:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

By Author:

[

First

|

Previous

|

Next

|

Last

]

Font:

Proportional Font

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC Home

POETRYETC  April 2008

POETRYETC April 2008

Options

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password

Subject:

Re: Perloff on anthologies

From:

Martin Dolan <[log in to unmask]>

Reply-To:

Poetryetc: poetry and poetics

Date:

Tue, 29 Apr 2008 23:52:53 +1000

Content-Type:

text/plain

Parts/Attachments:

Parts/Attachments

text/plain (310 lines)

The barman says "You should have ducked"...

> A horse and a chicken walk into a bar...
>
> judy prince wrote:
>> Looks like one of the bottom lines on anthologies, Tad,  is that they 
>> were "destructive" to me (& of course I maintain that it's the same 
>> for many other folks), but for others in different edu systems, 
>> pursuing different majors, and in different countries (as Roger Day's 
>> just detailed of his own situation), they were helpful.  (Tough for 
>> me to suss, since I didn't "come up" as he & others did.)  Hence it's 
>> enlightening to hear what others have experienced.  (Tho I confess to 
>> approaching a catatonic boredom at addressing the issue any more!!!)
>>
>> Any jokes you got this morning?  Non-poetry jokes, pulllleeeezzz! <g>
>>
>> Judy
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "TheOldMole" <[log in to unmask]>
>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 7:58 AM
>> Subject: Re: Perloff on anthologies
>>
>>
>> A mimeo'd collection of beloved poems, from Kipling to Cummings to
>> Service to Housman, or whoever -- IS an anthology, and is a marvelous
>> thing, but not absolutely guaranteed to be better than one put together
>> by Sam Gwynn or W. H. Auden or Kenneth Koch.
>>
>> I had a friend who also made his own anthology of poems that
>> particularly spoke to him. Since he lived in a small town, and wasn't a
>> habitue of  poetry-rich independent bookstores, his was entirely
>> composed of poems he had cut out of The New Yorker.
>>
>> Now, I know we know that New Yorker=bad, even worse than anthologies,
>> and most of us would not hold this up as a model, but my friend was
>> creating his own scrapbook of poems that meant something to him, from
>> what was available to him. My other friend who told me that she'd part
>> with almost anything sooner than her Norton anthology had fallen in love
>> with the riches to be found in a couple of thousand pages of poems, or
>> however many Norton has, and I don't think she was any more culturally
>> deprived than my New Yorker scrapbook friend, or you or Roger.
>> Anthologies aren't for everyone, and they aren't the only way to
>> experience poetry, but I can't accept the argument that they're 
>> destructive.
>>
>> And I say this as someone who doesn't assign anthologies to his classes.
>>
>> judy prince wrote:
>>> Wonderful, Roger, that you've chosen to embrace this issue---and 
>>> from your own poetry-awakenings---rather than peck at a convenient 
>>> stiff edge or two. My first knowing of poems was from my sis's (me 
>>> 11, she 16) homemade 3-ring binder filled with carefully-typewritten 
>>> poems.  She'd, as had your English teacher, and then you, given 
>>> herself the luxury of Her Own Collection, culled from those at 
>>> school and on our regular visits to the library.  For quite awhile I 
>>> assumed they were her own poems! <g>   Later, I just enjoyed 
>>> flipping thru the binder and memorizing bits, comforted by their 
>>> familiarity.
>>>
>>> Again I say that my prob is less (if at all) with the Selecting than 
>>> it is with the imposing and sanctioning of "standards" for poetry, 
>>> as presented in the Perfect Wholes of edu-anthologies.  For me, my 
>>> sister's collection meant I could do the same:  I could (at most) 
>>> write my own collection, or (at least) choose poems I preferred.  
>>> But the glossy, fat, annotated, annointed school anthologies made me 
>>> doubtful, glaze-eyed, and suspicious. I'd been +distanced+ from 
>>> poems, poets, and the possibility of my own creatings.  My model had 
>>> been my sister.  Now it was Somebody/ies that I never was and never 
>>> could be.  "Models" are profoundly important, esp for females and 
>>> "minorities"---as well as many males and most of the "majority" who 
>>> feel weirdly outside the mainframe.
>>>
>>> And to the lesser prob of Selection.  Though it seems the obvious 
>>> problem, I think it's largely a false issue.  Rather, anthologies 
>>> conveniently, and I think, disastrously, preclude the ways folk can 
>>> know poetry.   Let's just take one way as an example---the one that 
>>> most affected you.  If each of your teachers, eschewing anthologies, 
>>> had mimeo-ed poems they admired & loved---and from that 
>>> private-made-public joy had lit debates in class (the inimitable 
>>> "stick" of peer opinions goaded to gather resources)-----would you, 
>>> honestly, have suffered the lack of anthologies? You mite've had a 
>>> different patchwork of poems, but would it have been an "inferior", 
>>> less-igniting collection?  I suspect, from your telling, that it 
>>> would have opened more of the poetry world as well as your confident 
>>> participation in it.
>>>
>>> It may turn on WHO does the selecting, the evaluating, the 
>>> default-deciding of what is ("good") poetry.
>>>
>>> Judy
>>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Day" <[log in to unmask]>
>>> To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>> Sent: Tuesday, April 29, 2008 3:59 AM
>>> Subject: Re: Perloff on anthologies
>>>
>>>
>>> Kindof. I was thinking more about the happy wanderer in the bookshop,
>>> the person who never makes it to the litcrit class. We're stuck with a
>>> few large book-sellers and with the best will in the world, I can't
>>> see them stocking every small press and pamphlet. So this is the best
>>> we have. It's not good, it's not great. It leads to a lot of official
>>> poetasting, most of it distasteful. But hey, if some can be enticed
>>> who knows?
>>>
>>> I had an inspirational English teacher, and I kept the mimeographed
>>> poems he gave out; I also collected my own typed copies. So yes, I
>>> agree some people will ferret out their own anthology; I was
>>> kick-started by the selection of another. Whether they could do so
>>> totally by themselves is another matter. In your scenario, the happy
>>> wanderers are let free-range amongst a selection of pamphlets. Ah,
>>> selection. No matter where you turn, a selection process appears. If I
>>> type poetry into google I get mostly garbage. If I hadn't done the
>>> reading I've done, how could I tell the difference?
>>>
>>> I agree that Universities are deadening, the canon should be blasted
>>> from a cannon. But how can we rid our-selves of official culture?
>>>
>>> The Golden Treasury is laughable in the main but I've treasured some
>>> nuggets I found within. However, some anthologies - The Lyrical
>>> Ballads for one IIRC - seem to have had quite an effect in their time.
>>>
>>> Roger
>>>
>>> On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 11:35 PM, judy prince 
>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>> They sell bcuz they're easier to teach/defend and therefore 
>>>> entrenched in
>>>> the pre-uni and uni systems.  And there'll always be those who 
>>>> prefer Eggs
>>>> McMuffin or arranged marriages.
>>>>
>>>>  It's the imposition and the halo of "standards" that I particularly
>>>> dislike---these are vastly more harmful, I believe, than most folks 
>>>> think.
>>>> When certain poems/poets are sanctioned (in all the ways, including
>>>> anthologies, that schools/uni's use) , there grows a deadening, a 
>>>> boredom, a
>>>> shrug in many readers---many of whom will then prefer not to read more
>>>> poetry.  Happy the grouping (class, seminar, club gathering, ad hoc 
>>>> motleys)
>>>> that digs into a table of cheap or free poetry pamphlets or 
>>>> paperbacks and
>>>> starts reading and debating!  I'll bet that setting'd produce 
>>>> relatively
>>>> more poets than the anthology-using classroom.  My guess, also, is 
>>>> that the
>>>> solitary reader of poetry will quickly select-out from an anthology 
>>>> into
>>>> her/his own "table" of pamphlets and paperbacks---something the
>>>> self-propelled usually do.  But how many more folk are crabbed up in
>>>> classrooms?  Seems a shame to offer them---mainly and
>>>> continuously---regurgitated pabulum.
>>>>
>>>>  Judy
>>>>
>>>>  ----- Original Message ----- From: "Roger Day" <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>
>>>>  To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>>  Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 5:48 PM
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  Subject: Re: Perloff on anthologies
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  But they do sell, and they do give a taster of poetry to people who
>>>>  o'wise might not have read a range of poets.
>>>>
>>>>  Roger
>>>>
>>>>  On Mon, Apr 28, 2008 at 9:37 PM, judy prince 
>>>> <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Mark, I've always felt that anthologies---PC, Balanced, Proper,
>>>> Subjective,
>>>> > Pricey---ought to be replaced by a reader/student's own poetic 
>>>> choices
>>>> > amongst the banquet of inexpensive paperbacks.  A tradition of 
>>>> imposed
>>>> > aesthetic judgments (i.e., anthologies) demeans poetry, poets
>>>> and---not
>>>> the
>>>> > least---the readers of poetry.
>>>> >
>>>> >  Judy
>>>> >
>>>> >  ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mark Weiss" >
>>>> <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> >
>>>> >  To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> >  Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 3:16 PM
>>>> >  Subject: Re: Perloff on anthologies
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> >  Judy: In the lineup of poets she included in her
>>>> >  course Hughes is a lightweight, however much one
>>>> >  likes his work. Cesaire isn't. Context is all.
>>>> >  Which is why anthologizing is so tough.
>>>> >
>>>> >  Mark
>>>> >
>>>> >  At 03:04 PM 4/28/2008, you wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> > > Ah, alas, Doug, leaving out Langston Hughes, one of my all-time
>>>> > favourites!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Judy
>>>> > >
>>>> > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Douglas Barbour"
>>>> > <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> > > To: <[log in to unmask]>
>>>> > > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2008 2:23 PM
>>>> > > Subject: Perloff on anthologies
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > In another interview, Marjorie Perloff has this to say;
>>>> intereting in
>>>> > > light of Jon's comments:
>>>> > >
>>>> > >
>>>> > > DC:  Perhaps what is lacking in most journals and anthologies 
>>>> is an
>>>> > > inclusionary approach to poetry and not one dependent upon being a
>>>> > > card-carrying member of a particular poetic group. Such a 
>>>> criticism
>>>> > > could be leveled against some of the experimentalists as well 
>>>> as the
>>>> > > mainstream.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > MP: Yes, but anthologies are, by definition, problematic today
>>>> because
>>>> > > no gathering can be definitive and perhaps it's best to make up
>>>> one's
>>>> > > own for teaching purposes.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > DC: If you were to edit a poetry anthology and the publisher has
>>>> given
>>>> > > you total control over the anthology from inception to 
>>>> publication‹,
>>>> > > how would you choose what would be included? What would be the
>>>> > > governing principle that would hold the anthology together?
>>>> > >
>>>> > > MP: Well, I've never wanted to edit an anthology because I'm not
>>>> sure
>>>> > > there's a good way of doing it at the moment: there are too many
>>>> > > schools, factions, movements, interests. But if I did, my 
>>>> criterion
>>>> > > would be VALUE. I would want to include only those poets whose
>>>> work is
>>>> > > distinctive, original, really interesting, regardless of 
>>>> male/female
>>>> > > ratios, identity politics, and so on. So that's why I don't 
>>>> edit an
>>>> > > anthology. These days one must be sensitive to all the special
>>>> > > interests.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > In teaching (which is a bit like anthologizing, isn't it?), I do
>>>> > > relatively few poets. This year in "Modern Poetry" at USC, a 
>>>> 15-week
>>>> > > semester—I taught Eliot, Pound, Stein, Duchamp, Stevens, Moore, 
>>>> Loy,
>>>> > > Williams--and then Aimé Césaire even though in translation,
>>>> because I
>>>> > > think he's a much stronger poet than, say, Claude McKay or 
>>>> Langston
>>>> > > Hughes and I did want to teach some African-American poetry.
>>>> Notice I
>>>> > > omitted Frost and H.D. Simply a matter of taste: I never teach
>>>> work I
>>>> > > don't really like.
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Doug
>>>> > > Douglas Barbour
>>>> > > [log in to unmask]
>>>> > >
>>>> > > http://www.ualberta.ca/~dbarbour/
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Latest books:
>>>> > > Continuations (with Sheila E Murphy)
>>>> > > http://www.uap.ualberta.ca/UAP.asp?LID=41&bookID=664
>>>> > > Wednesdays'
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> http://abovegroundpress.blogspot.com/2008/03/new-from-aboveground-press_10.html 
>>>>
>>>> > >
>>>> > > There are no wrong notes!
>>>> > >
>>>> > > Thelonious Sphere Monk
>>>> > >
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  --
>>>>  My Stuff: http://www.badstep.net/
>>>>  "She went out with her paint box, paints the chapel blue
>>>>  She went out with her matches, torched the car-wash too"
>>>>  The Go-Betweens
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>

Top of Message | Previous Page | Permalink

JiscMail Tools


RSS Feeds and Sharing


Advanced Options


Archives

March 2024
February 2024
January 2024
December 2023
November 2023
October 2023
September 2023
August 2023
July 2023
June 2023
May 2023
April 2023
March 2023
February 2023
January 2023
December 2022
November 2022
October 2022
September 2022
August 2022
July 2022
June 2022
May 2022
April 2022
March 2022
February 2022
January 2022
December 2021
November 2021
October 2021
September 2021
August 2021
July 2021
June 2021
May 2021
April 2021
March 2021
February 2021
January 2021
December 2020
November 2020
October 2020
September 2020
August 2020
July 2020
June 2020
May 2020
April 2020
March 2020
February 2020
January 2020
December 2019
November 2019
October 2019
September 2019
August 2019
July 2019
June 2019
May 2019
April 2019
March 2019
February 2019
January 2019
December 2018
November 2018
October 2018
September 2018
August 2018
July 2018
June 2018
May 2018
April 2018
March 2018
February 2018
January 2018
December 2017
November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
2005
2004
2003
2002
2001
2000


JiscMail is a Jisc service.

View our service policies at https://www.jiscmail.ac.uk/policyandsecurity/ and Jisc's privacy policy at https://www.jisc.ac.uk/website/privacy-notice

For help and support help@jisc.ac.uk

Secured by F-Secure Anti-Virus CataList Email List Search Powered by the LISTSERV Email List Manager